Loading...
Loading...
Found 10 Skills
GitHub Issues-first workflow with sub-issues hierarchy. TRIGGERS - issue hierarchy, sub-issues, issue tracking, research workflow, cross-repo issues.
Render the current plan as a high-DPI PNG dependency DAG — nodes are issues / sub-issues / PRs, edges come from sub-issue links plus dependency-language prose ("Depends on", "Part of", "Blocks", "Closes") and PR / commit cross-references, and every node is color-coded done / in-progress / available-next / blocked so sequencing and critical path are obvious at a glance. Use when asked "plan as dag", "draw a dag", "dag diagram", "show the dependency graph", "what's blocking what", "what's the critical path", "what can be parallelized", "what's left for
Issue quality primitives: lint, enrich, decompose. `/issue lint [#N|--all]` — Score issues against org-standards. `/issue enrich [#N]` — Fill gaps with sub-agent research. `/issue decompose [#N]` — Split oversized issues into atomic sub-issues.
Break a large GitHub issue into independent, mergeable sub-issues with clear scope and acceptance criteria. Use when user says 'split this issue', 'break this down', 'this issue is too big', 'splice this epic', 'create sub-issues', or 'decompose this task'. Do NOT use for planning implementation steps within a single issue (use plan-issue) or for creating a fresh issue from scratch.
Turn a GitHub issue into an implementation plan — investigate the codebase, propose an approach, list critical files and changes, outline test strategy. Use when user says 'plan this issue', 'what's the approach for', 'how would I tackle', 'implementation plan for', or 'before coding'. Do NOT use for actually implementing (write the code directly after the plan) or for breaking a too-large issue into sub-issues (use splice-issue).
Break a spec, plan, or conversation into tracer-bullet tickets, each declaring its blocking edges, published as GitHub sub-issues.
Deterministic issue-relationship graph over GitHub native sub-issues + dependencies — compute the ready set / parent-rollup candidates / close-kick targets as pure calculation (scripts, no LLM judgment), write real edges when creating spin-off issues, and mutually exclude terminal actions across parallel agents via claim-comment fencing. Called by issue-sweep (candidate injection), issue-review (edge writing + rollup), and the future agent:ready producer routine.
GitHub Projects (v2) setup and management via gh CLI + GraphQL: organize a repo's issues into epics with native sub-issues, drive a board Status flow (Todo -> In Progress -> Done), set Project Priority, classify with native issue Types (Task/Bug/Feature) instead of labels, scope work with milestones (incl. resolving "current milestone"), and maintain an Epic + Upcoming roadmap. Use when setting up or managing a GitHub Project/roadmap, creating an epic with issues, adding or moving issues between epics, picking up or closing work on the board, (re)prioritizing, setting issue types, creating or closing milestones, enabling project workflows, or configuring gh project read-only allowlists. Not for PR workflows (git-pr), CI/CD status (git-ci), or commit messages (git-commit)
プロジェクトのドラフトアイテム (DraftIssue) を実 GitHub Issue に変換し、Status/Priority/Size 等のフィールド値を引き継ぐ。親 Issue を指定または新規作成して `gh api .../sub_issues` で sub-issue として紐付け可能。「ドラフトを Issue 化」「DraftIssue を変換」「プロジェクトのタスクを Issue にして」などで使用。
Create GitHub Issues with a parent-child structure (sub-issues). Generate parent and child issues using `gh issue create`, and link the parent-child relationship with `gh api .../sub_issues`. It is recommended to use Conventional Commits format (`feat:`, `fix:`, etc.) for titles. Used for scenarios like "Create an Issue" and "Break down tasks into Issues".