Loading...
Loading...
Found 29 Skills
Define user-facing product behavior from validated evidence and approved scope. Use for information architecture, task flows, state and recovery models, interface contracts, usability-study plans, interaction-pattern tradeoffs, or engineering UX handoffs. Use after product discovery and product decisions; route WCAG/ARIA conformance work to web-accessibility and formal software specifications to spec-driven-development. Do not use this skill for unrelated requests; route to the nearest named specialist.
Run an autonomous, spec-driven development "saga" for medium-to-large features using an orchestrator agent and a fleet of worker subagents. Use this skill whenever the user invokes /saga, asks to autonomously build a sizable feature end-to-end with minimal human intervention, wants a comprehensive spec broken into milestones and tasks with airtight validation criteria before parallelized implementation, or wants an orchestrator to delegate implementation to worker agents while preserving its own context window. Trigger on phrases like "run a saga", "autonomously implement this feature", "spec it out then build it with subagents", "orchestrate this big feature end-to-end", or "build this with workers and validate each step". Also use this skill when asked to continue, resume, or pick up an existing saga from its saga directory (e.g. under ~/.sagas).
Creates agent-optimized technical design documents with context-layer-aware progressive disclosure for architecture decisions, component design, and data models. Use when writing technical designs, architecture docs, defining system components, or making technology choices for spec-driven development.
Transform reverse-engineering documentation into GitHub Spec Kit format. Initializes .specify/ directory, creates constitution.md, generates specifications from reverse-engineered docs, and sets up for /speckit slash commands. This is Step 3 of 6 in the reverse engineering process.
Implement an approved spec or focused unambiguous task through stale-safe source edits. Use when the user wants code written — "implement this", "cook this spec", "/cook .cheese/specs/<slug>.md", or "fix this bug" when the fix is clear; also when the user just says "go" or "ship it" with a spec or clear acceptance criteria in scope. Runs standalone on an unambiguous task — a spec helps but is not required. Do NOT use for fuzzy planning (`/mold`), no-write discussion (`/culture`), or review-only work (`/age`).
Guides LLM agents through large-scale coding tasks using a spec-driven, phase-by-phase methodology covering requirement definition, planning, algorithm design, and implementation with OOP principles and language-specific coding standards. Use when starting a new software project, implementing a complex feature, refactoring existing code, or when you need a disciplined step-by-step approach to any non-trivial coding task.
Disciplined spec-driven test-driven development workflow for building software with AI coding agents. Transforms ambiguous requests into verified implementations through structured specification, test derivation, and strict TDD. Handles greenfield projects, brownfield enhancements (with or without existing tests), refactors, and complex bug fixes with workflow-specific guidance for each. Use when the user requests a new feature, module, enhancement, refactor, API, data pipeline, CLI tool, or system with multiple requirements, edge cases, or unclear specifications. Also use for complex bug fixes requiring root cause analysis. Triggers on phrases like "add a feature", "implement", "build a new module", "build an API", "build a CLI", "build a data pipeline", "refactor", "fix this bug", "write tests for", "TDD", "test-first", "the requirements are unclear", "characterization tests", or "spec this out". Triggers when modifying code with adjacent test files (`tests/`, `*_test.py`, `*.test.ts`, `*.spec.ts`, `spec/`, `__tests__/`) or test framework config (pytest.ini, jest.config.*, go.mod with testing imports, Cargo.toml with [dev-dependencies], package.json with a test script). Triggers when the user mentions edge cases, invariants, acceptance criteria, EARS notation, or red-green-refactor. Do NOT use for simple one-line fixes, cosmetic changes, formatting, renames, dependency bumps, or tasks where requirements are already fully specified with tests provided.
Continue working on an OpenSpec change by creating the next artifact. Use when the user wants to progress their change, create the next artifact, or continue their workflow.
Creates implementation tasks as Claude Code custom slash commands with dependency ordering and atomic scope. Use when breaking down features into executable task commands, planning implementation order, defining task dependencies, or when user mentions task breakdown, implementation plan, or work decomposition for spec-driven development.
Bug → spec protocol. When a bug is found or a test fails, trace the cause, decide whether a new §V invariant would catch recurrence, append to §B. This is the one non-obvious thing SDD does that plan-then-execute doesn't. Triggers on test failure, bug report, post-mortem, or explicit user ask.
Use when the user wants to set up spec-driven development (OpenSpec + superpowers-bridge) in a project, or when initializing a new project that needs the SDD workflow. Idempotent. Runs the bundled scripts/run.sh.
Use when exploring unclear requirements or architectural decisions - refines rough ideas into clear requirements/designs through collaborative questioning (one at a time), explores alternatives, validates incrementally. Activates when user has vague feature idea, mentions "not sure about", "exploring options", "what approach", or during spec-driven requirements/design phases.