Loading...
Loading...
Found 5 Skills
Help users break down product requirements into phased version plans. Triggered when users say "split versions", "version planning", "how to build MVP", "phased implementation".
Break down a requirement that is "too large to be implemented as a single feature" into a list of sub-features with dependencies and statuses, and place it in the independent `codestable/roadmap/{slug}/` directory — serving as the seed and scheduling basis for subsequent multiple feature processes. Two modes: new (draft a new roadmap from a large requirement), update (refresh an existing roadmap: add items, modify dependencies, reorder, mark as drop). Division of labor with requirements / architecture — those two record "what the system is now", while the roadmap records "what we plan to do next". Trigger scenarios: Users say "I want an X system", "Help me break down this requirement", "Schedule this large requirement", "Create a roadmap", or it is found during the feature-design phase that the requirement is too large to fit into a single feature.
Technical implementation planning and architecture design. Capabilities: feature planning, system architecture, technical evaluation, implementation roadmaps, requirement breakdown, trade-off analysis, codebase analysis, solution design. Actions: plan, architect, design, evaluate, breakdown technical solutions. Keywords: implementation plan, technical design, architecture, system design, roadmap, requirements analysis, trade-offs, technical evaluation, feature planning, solution design, scalability, security, maintainability, sprint planning, task breakdown. Use when: planning new features, designing system architecture, evaluating technical approaches, creating implementation roadmaps, breaking down complex requirements, assessing technical trade-offs.
Expert at detecting stories that are too big and applying splitting heuristics. Use when user describes work that seems large, mentions multiple features in one story, or needs help breaking down requirements. Detects linguistic red flags (and, or, manage, handle) and suggests concrete splitting strategies. Use when: - Story has obvious red flags: "and", "or", "manage", "handle", "including" - User describes multiple features bundled together - Story feels vague or too large - User asks "how to split this story" Do NOT use when: - Story is already small and focused (< 1 day work) - Feature needs layered analysis without obvious split points (use hamburger-method instead) - User asks HOW to implement (use micro-steps-coach instead)
Turns product or tech specs into concrete Notion tasks that Claude code can implement. Breaks down spec pages into detailed implementation plans with clear tasks, acceptance criteria, and progress tracking to guide development from requirements to completion.