Loading...
Loading...
Found 4 Skills
Analyzes and refines agent skills by identifying quality issues, prioritizing fixes (MUST/SHOULD/NICE), gathering user feedback, and implementing improvements. Checks for common problems like time estimates, oversized SKILL.md files, poor structure, redundant content, missing examples, and unclear workflows. Use when reviewing, improving, refactoring, or auditing existing skills. Triggers include "review skill", "improve skill", "refactor skill", "skill quality", "audit skill", "fix skill", "optimize skill", "analyze skill".
Validates skills against production-level criteria with 9-category scoring. This skill should be used when reviewing, auditing, or improving skills to ensure quality standards. Evaluates structure, content, user interaction, documentation, domain standards, technical robustness, maintainability, zero-shot implementation, and reusability. Returns actionable validation report with scores and improvement recommendations.
Evaluate agents and skills for quality, completeness, and standards compliance using a 6-step rubric: Identify, Structural, Content, Code, Integration, Report. Use when auditing agents/skills, checking quality after creation or update, or reviewing collection health. Triggers: "evaluate", "audit", "check quality", "review agent", "score skill". Do NOT use for creating or modifying agents/skills — only for read-only assessment and scoring.
Quality review and audit for Claude Code skills. Analyzes skill structure, description quality, workflow design, token efficiency, and anti-patterns against best practices. Use when user wants to review a skill, audit a skill, check skill quality, evaluate a skill, critique a skill, lint a skill, or validate a skill. Triggers: 'review skill', 'audit skill', 'skill quality', 'check my skill', 'evaluate skill', 'skill lint', 'validate skill', 'skill review', 'is this skill good', 'improve this skill'.