Loading...
Loading...
Found 22 Skills
Evaluate the reproducibility of technical articles. Dispatch a subagent to simulate a first-time reader reproducing the work locally and list missing information. Use as the final check on a draft before publication.
Provides comprehensive CLAUDE.md file management capabilities including auditing, quality assessment, and targeted improvements. Use when user asks to check, audit, update, improve, fix, maintain, or validate CLAUDE.md files. Also triggers for "project memory optimization", "CLAUDE.md quality check", "documentation review", or when CLAUDE.md needs to be created from scratch. This skill scans all CLAUDE.md files, evaluates quality against standardized criteria, outputs detailed quality reports with scores and recommendations, then makes targeted updates with user approval.
Pragmatic qualitative analysis for interview data in sociology research. Guides you through systematic coding, interpretation, and synthesis with quality checkpoints. Supports theory-informed (Track A) or data-first (Track B) approaches.
Adds documents to golden dataset with validation. Use when curating test data or saving examples.
Apply effective software quality consultancy practices. Use when consulting, advising clients, or establishing consultancy workflows.
PluginEval quality methodology — dimensions, rubrics, statistical methods, and scoring formulas. Use this skill when understanding how plugin quality is measured, when interpreting a low score on a specific dimension, when deciding how to improve a skill's triggering accuracy or orchestration fitness, when calibrating scoring thresholds for your marketplace, or when explaining quality badges to external partners like Neon.
Evaluate skill quality against best practices. Use when asked to "rate this skill", "review skill quality", "check skill formatting", "is this skill good", "evaluate SKILL.md", "grade this skill", or when validating skill files before publishing.
Novel Chapter Review - Triggered when proofreading, reviewing, or evaluating the quality of novel chapters is required. Keywords: review, proofread, manuscript evaluation, inspection, quality assessment.
Defines evaluation criteria and scoring methodologies for deliverable assessment
Analyze an unfamiliar repository and explain what it does, how it runs, what architectural choices define it, where the important code lives, and what deserves deeper inspection next. Use this whenever a user has just cloned a repo, wants onboarding help, asks for a repo walkthrough, or needs a reliable first-pass architecture analysis.
Review changes for regressions, contract mismatches, quality gaps, and missing validation evidence.
Audits an existing pm-skills skill against structural conventions and quality criteria. Produces a structured validation report with pass/fail checks, severity-graded findings, and actionable recommendations. Use when checking whether a skill meets repo standards before shipping or after making changes.