Loading...
Loading...
Found 36 Skills
Intelligent QA assistant that automates writing test cases from project documentation. Use when the user wants to generate test cases from requirements, runs /init, /parse, /style, /plan, /generate, /export, or works with PDF/DOCX/XLSX requirement documents and TestRail-ready Excel export.
Creates a structured bug report from a description, or analyzes code to identify potential bugs. Ensures every bug report has full reproduction steps, severity assessment, and context.
[BETA] Dogfood the active branch end-to-end as a QA engineer. Diffs the branch against main, builds an exhaustive browser test matrix of every change (full user journeys, not just features), drives the app with agent-browser, then auto-fixes issues, adds regression tests, and commits each fix until the matrix is green. Use when you want a hands-off 'test everything we just built and make it actually work' pass before shipping.
Creates, updates, and fixes Cypress tests (E2E/end-to-end and component tests). Use when the user asks to create tests, add tests, write tests, update tests, test this file/component, new spec, or fix a failing or flaky test. Apply even when the user does not say 'Cypress' (e.g. 'create tests for this file'). Prefer cypress-explain when the user only wants to explain or review tests without changing code.
Generate comprehensive test plans, test cases, regression test suites, automation annotations, and bug reports for QA engineers. Includes Figma MCP integration for design validation. Use when planning QA before execution, documenting test strategies, marking which flows require E2E follow-up, or creating structured bug reports. Do not use for executing tests against a live repository or running verification gates — use qa-execution for that.
Control terminal TUIs and web/Electron apps for testing, demos, QA, and computer-use tasks. Use when you need to automate a CLI, drive a browser, record a demo, or capture proof artifacts.
Generate end to end automated tests for existing features. Use when the user says "create qa automated tests for [feature]"
QA test a live website with Firecrawl browser and scrape evidence. Use when the user wants exploratory QA, form testing, navigation/link checks, responsive checks, performance observations, bug reports, or a pre-launch quality review.
TDD feature build loop: spec (RED) → implement (GREEN) → refactor. Pass the feature name as argument.
File or link CawPlan defects from failed/blocked TestRail Results via QA Insights A4. Use when: SQA wants to turn a TestRail Failed/Blocked Result into a CawPlan Ticket, paste a tests/view URL to file a defect, review an A4 defect draft, create a BUGFIX/FEATURE ticket, or link an existing ticket back to TestRail defects. Cold start with tests/view MUST call execution failures --test-id BEFORE defects draft; never use test_id as the draft path result_id. A4 write path (create-ticket) MUST use --body-file or --body JSON — never field flags like --description or --result-id. NOT for: importing test cases (use `cawplan-testcase-import`); creating TestRail Plans/Runs (use `cawplan-testplan-layout`); release risk assessment; generating requirements or test points.
Operating system for intake, approvals, QA, and training across brand stakeholders.
Zero Script QA - Testing methodology without test scripts. Uses structured JSON logging and real-time Docker monitoring for verification. Use proactively when user needs to verify features through log analysis instead of test scripts. Triggers: zero script qa, log-based testing, docker logs, 제로 스크립트 QA, ゼロスクリプトQA, 零脚本QA, QA sin scripts, pruebas basadas en logs, registros de docker, QA sans script, tests basés sur les logs, journaux docker, skriptloses QA, log-basiertes Testen, Docker-Logs, QA senza script, test basati sui log, log docker Do NOT use for: unit testing, static analysis, or projects without Docker setup.