Loading...
Loading...
Found 8 Skills
The combined phase of mathematical modeling competition problem analysis and modeling design. It is used to read the problem statement and attachments, and complete sub-problem decomposition, data understanding, hypothesis pre-check, variable definition, model formulas, objective functions, constraint conditions, solution strategies, and a modeling report that can be handed over for code implementation.
Think carefully no matter what question you answer. Before answering any question or performing any task, conduct in-depth analysis and reasoning first.
Socratic questioning to examine beliefs, uncover assumptions, and develop deeper understanding. Use to challenge thinking, evaluate proposals, or teach without lecturing.
Use when a selective defect needs IS/IS-NOT difference analysis or a consequential option choice needs must/want weighting and adverse-consequence comparison.
Deep multi-framework reasoning using Gemini. Use for complex problem analysis, challenging ideas, and evaluating multiple options with structured thinking.
문제를 분석하여 Agent Teams를 자동 구성하고, 4가지 조율 패턴(distribute/monitor/discourse/sequence) 중 최적 패턴으로 협업한다. "/teams {문제 설명}"으로 호출한다.
Помогает совместно прояснить задачу, проверить идею, найти корневую причину проблемы или выбрать подход без реализации. Используй, когда пользователь просит обсудить задачу, разобраться в проблеме, сравнить варианты или задаёт вопросы «что думаешь?» и «как лучше сделать?». Не используй, когда пользователь явно просит составить план, реализовать задачу, проверить изменения кода или сохранить знания проекта.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze from first principles", "第一性原理", "从根本分析", "从零开始思考", "think from scratch", "question this design", "这个设计合理吗", "is this the right approach", "为什么要这样做", "why are we doing it this way", "有没有更好的方案", "is there a better solution", "challenge assumptions", "挑战假设", "should this even exist", "這個需求合理嗎", "先刪除", or needs to evaluate architectural decisions, design choices, or problem-solving approaches without relying on analogies or conventions.