Loading...
Loading...
Found 19 Skills
Handles GitHub issue resolution end-to-end for prompts like "solve #123", "lets solve #123", "work on #123", "work on https://github.com/owner/repo/issues/123", or by pasting a direct GitHub issue URL as the request. USE FOR: solve #123, continue work on issue #123, work on https://github.com/owner/repo/issues/123, paste a GitHub issue URL for implementation work. DO NOT USE FOR: issue drafting only, PR review only, or non-implementation research.
Run a Meticulous test run after implementing a frontend change, then hands off to the `meticulous-review` skill to classify each visual change as intended or unintended. Use when implementing a feature autonomously end-to-end before creating a PR.
Git Commit Specification, covering commit message format (feat/fix/refactor), Issue linking, branch naming, PR submission preparation, and rebase usage. Used when users submit code, write commit messages, create branches, or prepare PRs.
create git commits and push code to GitHub safely. use when the user asks to commit, create branch, push changes, or prepare a pull request-ready commit with clear scope and verification.
Three-stage code review protocol: spec compliance, code quality, and domain integrity. Activate when reviewing code, preparing PRs, assessing implementation quality, or checking that code matches requirements. Triggers on: "review this code", "prepare PR", "check implementation", "code quality", "does this match the spec".
Prepare a GitHub PR for merge by rebasing onto main, fixing review findings, running gates, committing fixes, and pushing to the PR head branch. Use after /review-pr. Never merge or push to main.
Use when preparing branches, commits, or PRs for Python changes — scoping work, running validation gates, and ensuring merge readiness. Also use when debugging CI gate failures, resolving lockfile conflicts, or uncertain what checks to run before opening a PR.
A comprehensive verification system for Claude Code sessions.
Check work and detect drift before committing. A second opinion that catches misalignment early. Use at natural pause points, before PRs, or when something feels off.
Relentlessly critiques code against classic software engineering principles (SOLID, separation of concerns) to prevent "clever process shenanigans" and spaghetti code. Use before finalizing a feature or opening a PR.
Merges valuable content into permanent documentation, then deletes source files. Use when you have untracked *_REPORT.md or *_ANALYSIS.md files, git status shows markdown artifacts that shouldn't be committed, preparing PR and need to clean up working artifacts, preserving insights from code reviews. Do not use when files are already in docs/ or skills/ locations. DO NOT use when: files are intentionally temporary scratch notes. DO NOT use when: source files have no extractable value.
When reporting that work is completed, fixed, or ready for use before submitting or creating a PR - you need to run verification commands and confirm the output before making any success claims; evidence always precedes assertion