Loading...
Loading...
Found 6 Skills
Mandatory only on the task-file path of `spec-loop-plan-task` after implementation approval. Use when implementation deviates from the approved task, when uncertainty must be clarified instead of guessed through, when new blocking questions arise, or before presenting the current task or subtask to the User. Governs clarification routing, canonical task updates when explicit User clarification, accepted review feedback, or explicit post-implementation User approval changes the current task definition, the post-implementation `Implementation notes` check, and whether the increment may move to `review`. May be applied in parallel with other implementation-related skills.
Comprehensive documentation audit and generation. Launches parallel agents for high-level docs, module-level docs, decision records, and state diagrams. Use when: documentation gaps, post-implementation docs, README updates, architecture docs.
Conducts retrospective with learnings and improvement actions. Use when a cycle, sprint, or delivery has ended and the team needs to reflect on what worked and what needs to change. Also absorbs post-implementation reflection aspects.
Post-implementation reality check. Run after tests pass, before declaring done. Use when completing a feature, bug fix, refactor, or integration — or when asked to verify, sanity check, or confirm something actually works.
Verify completed implementation against the plan. Checks that all tasks were fully implemented, nothing was forgotten, code compiles, tests pass, and quality standards are met. Use after "/aif-implement" completes, or when user says "verify", "check work", "did we miss anything".
Review code after implementation work to identify design flaws, abstraction issues, or maintenance risks that only became clear once real code was written. Use whenever the user asks whether a recent change exposed architectural problems, whether an abstraction is fighting the implementation, or whether a refactor is justified. Be conservative and avoid suggesting refactors without concrete evidence of recurring cost or complexity.