Loading...
Loading...
Found 253 Skills
Help users create high-quality skills by discovering and incorporating proven methodologies from domain experts. Use this skill BEFORE skill-creator when users want to create a new skill - it enhances skill-creator by first identifying expert frameworks and best practices to incorporate. Triggers on requests like "help me create a skill for X" or "I want to make a skill that does Y". This skill guides methodology selection, then hands off to skill-creator for the actual skill generation.
QA an analysis before sharing -- methodology, accuracy, and bias checks. Use when reviewing an analysis before a stakeholder presentation, spot-checking calculations and aggregation logic, verifying a SQL query's results look right, or assessing whether conclusions are actually supported by the data.
Technical research methodology with YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles. Phases: scope definition, information gathering, analysis, synthesis, recommendation. Capabilities: technology evaluation, architecture analysis, best practices research, trade-off assessment, solution design. Actions: research, analyze, evaluate, compare, recommend technical solutions. Keywords: research, technology evaluation, best practices, architecture analysis, trade-offs, scalability, security, maintainability, YAGNI, KISS, DRY, technical analysis, solution design, competitive analysis, feasibility study. Use when: researching technologies, evaluating architectures, analyzing best practices, comparing solutions, assessing technical trade-offs, planning scalable/secure systems.
Define your Method — the unique methodology you use to deliver your transformation. This is the third element of the World Code framework. Use when someone says "define my method", "my methodology", "how I solve problems", "unique approach", or "method element".
Query the bundled research knowledge graph for methodology guidance. Routes questions through a 3-tier knowledge base — WHY (research claims), HOW (guidance docs), WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE (domain examples) — plus structured reference documents. Returns research-backed answers grounded in specific claims with practical application to the user's system. Triggers on "/ask", "/ask [question]", "why does my system...", "how should I...".
Four common skill archetypes with structure templates - CLI reference, methodology, safety/security, and orchestration. Use when creating new skills to select appropriate structure.
AI-driven Game Development Studio using BMAD methodology. Routes game projects through Pre-production, Design, Architecture, Production, and Game Testing phases with 6 specialized agents. Supports Unity, Unreal Engine, Godot, and custom engines.
Forces exhaustive problem-solving using corporate PUA rhetoric and structured debugging methodology. MUST trigger when: (1) any task has failed 2+ times or you're stuck in a loop tweaking the same approach; (2) you're about to say 'I cannot', suggest the user do something manually, or blame the environment without verifying; (3) you catch yourself being passive — not searching, not reading source, not verifying, just waiting for instructions; (4) user expresses frustration in ANY form: 'try harder', 'stop giving up', 'figure it out', 'why isn't this working', 'again???', '换个方法', '为什么还不行', '你再试试', '加油', '你怎么又失败了', or any similar sentiment even if phrased differently. Also trigger when facing complex multi-step debugging, environment issues, config problems, or deployment failures where giving up early is tempting. Applies to ALL task types: code, config, research, writing, deployment, infrastructure, API integration. Do NOT trigger on first-attempt failures or when a known fix is already executing successfully.
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
Provides MoAI-ADK foundational principles including TRUST 5 quality framework, SPEC-First DDD methodology, delegation patterns, progressive disclosure, and agent catalog reference. Use when referencing TRUST 5 gates, SPEC workflow, EARS format, DDD methodology, agent delegation patterns, or MoAI orchestration rules. Do NOT use for context and token management (use moai-foundation-context instead) or strategic analysis (use moai-foundation-philosopher instead).
Spec-Driven Development methodology for AI-assisted development. Use when working in a LeanSpec project.