Loading...
Loading...
Found 4 Skills
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
Critiques ML conference papers with reviewer-style feedback. Use when users want to anticipate reviewer concerns, identify weaknesses, check claim-evidence gaps, or find missing citations.
Novel Chapter Review - Triggered when proofreading, reviewing, or evaluating the quality of novel chapters is required. Keywords: review, proofread, manuscript evaluation, inspection, quality assessment.
Use when reviewing academic papers, proposals, experiments, claims, related work, novelty, methodology, or manuscripts as a severe but fair peer reviewer before submission.