Loading...
Loading...
Found 4 Skills
Exploratory discussion pattern for unsolved problems. Replicate the thinking of Staff+ engineers: "When there's no clear answer, expose blind spots by confronting diverse perspectives." True multi-agent discussions where experts directly engage with each other through team-based + messaging architecture.
This skill is used when users explicitly request "review NSFC proposals", "simulate expert review", or "evaluate NSFC applications". It simulates the perspective of domain experts to conduct multi-dimensional reviews of NSFC proposals, outputting graded issues and actionable modification suggestions. ⚠️ Not applicable: when users only want to write/modify a specific section of a proposal (use the nsfc-*-writer series skills instead), only want to understand review criteria (answer directly), or have no clear "review/evaluate" intent.
Channel the mental models, decision frameworks, and communication style of real experts (Steve Jobs, DHH, Rich Hickey, etc.) to approach problems the way they would. Use when the user says "summon", "channel", "what would [name] think", "ask [name]", or wants an expert perspective on a problem.
Assemble 2-3 complementary experts to collaboratively analyze anything. Experts work together to explore topics from multiple expert angles.