Loading...
Loading...
Found 7 Skills
Use when the user needs workflow orchestration such as branching, concurrency, approvals, waiting and resume, runtime stream, restart-safe execution, mixed sync/async function or module orchestration, event-driven fan-out, process-clarity refactors that make stages explicit, performance-oriented refactors that collapse split requests, or explicit draft-review-revise style multi-stage flows. The user does not need to say TriggerFlow explicitly.
Review and send Telegram response drafts, manage follow-ups for unanswered outbound messages. Use when the user says "/tg-responder review", "/tg-responder status", "/tg-responder follow-ups", "check telegram drafts", "review pending messages", "telegram inbox", "who hasn't replied", or "follow up".
Read as a specified first-time reader persona and report the felt experience. Use for skill-only workflows when a draft needs persona-bound reader-response signal instead of analytical critique.
Eva Brief is an independent entry for commercial brief breakdown. It is only used when users explicitly request to break down brand briefs, brand cooperation requirements, generate commercial constraint cards, check existing commercial drafts against briefs, or migrate the structure of benchmark samples for the same product. It only generates brief analysis, selling point pools, commercial constraint cards, or revision handover materials, and does not directly write complete commercial drafts, titles, openings, or full text; general requests such as "how to write a commercial draft / how to present product selling points / help me create commercial content" should be redirected to Eva's main creation workflow. Trigger methods: /eva-brief, eva-brief, commercial brief, brand brief, brand cooperation requirement, help me break down the brief, create commercial constraint card, check against brief, can this commercial draft be submitted, check commercial draft, commercial sample of the same product, brand reference sample.
Adversarial reading methodology for narrative fiction — find what doesn't work, not confirm what does. Focus-area driven with dedicated resources per area. Use when reviewing drafts, evaluating prose quality, or assessing changes at any stage.
Review a draft for big-picture issues in argument, structure, stakes, evidence, and payoff. Use when a piece needs developmental editing, a top-level diagnosis, or substantial restructuring before sentence polish.
Convene a panel of reviewers to analyze a draft from multiple perspectives, then synthesize their feedback into consensus findings, productive tensions, and prioritized recommendations.