Loading...
Loading...
Found 22 Skills
Generate comprehensive Vitest tests for code examples in JavaScript concept documentation pages, following project conventions and referencing source lines
Use when the requested deliverable includes creating, reviewing, moving, splitting, or updating a repository AGENTS.md; produces scoped repo guidance. Do not trigger for standalone skills, prompts, non-AGENTS instruction files, READMEs, changelogs, or architecture docs.
Best practices for validating Dart documentation comments. Covers using `dart doc` to catch unresolved references and macros.
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
Compile an agent-optimized changelog by cross-referencing git history with plans and documentation. Use when asked to "update changelog", "compile history", "document project evolution", or proactively after major milestones, architectural changes, or when stale/deprecated information is detected that could confuse coding agents.
Create domain-specific quality checklists validating spec completeness and clarity
Prepare R packages for CRAN submission by checking for common ad-hoc requirements not caught by devtools::check(). Use when: (1) Preparing a package for first CRAN release, (2) Preparing a package update for CRAN resubmission, (3) Reviewing a package to ensure CRAN compliance, (4) Responding to CRAN reviewer feedback. Covers documentation requirements, DESCRIPTION field standards, URL validation, examples, and administrative requirements.
Creates reference documentation structure + smart documents (ADRs/Guides/Manuals) based on TECH_STACK. Only creates justified documents (nontrivial technology choices). L2 Worker in ln-100-documents-pipeline.
Semantic content auditor (L3 Worker). Verifies document content matches stated SCOPE, aligns with project goals, and reflects actual codebase state. Called by ln-600 for each project document. Returns scope_alignment and fact_accuracy scores with findings.
Documentation consistency reviewer that checks alignment between code implementation and documentation. Use when user requests reviewing documentation vs code consistency, checking if README/docs are outdated, verifying API documentation accuracy. Applicable for (1) reviewing README vs implementation consistency (2) checking if docs/ directory content is outdated (3) verifying API/config documentation accuracy (4) generating documentation consistency reports. Trigger words include doc review, documentation consistency, check outdated docs, verify docs.
Validate and prepare documentation for GitHub Pages deployment
Verify technical accuracy of JavaScript concept pages by checking code examples, MDN/ECMAScript compliance, and external resources to prevent misinformation