Loading...
Loading...
Found 12 Skills
Applies the Diataxis framework to create or improve technical documentation. Use when being asked to write high quality tutorials, how-to guides, reference docs, or explanations, when reviewing documentation quality, or when deciding what type of documentation to create. Helps identify documentation types using the action/cognition and acquisition/application dimensions.
Execute a comprehensive Flutter Project Health Audit. Analyzes tech stack, architecture, state management, testing, code quality, CI/CD, and documentation. Produces a Google Docs-ready report with section scores and weighted overall score. Use when the user asks to audit a Flutter project, run a health check, evaluate project quality, or assess technical debt. Triggers on: 'flutter audit', 'health audit', 'project audit', 'flutter health', 'tech debt assessment', 'project quality check'.
Remove telltale signs of AI-generated 'slop' writing from README files and documentation. Make your docs sound authentically human.
Detect and flag AI-generated content markers in documentation and prose. Use when reviewing documentation for AI markers, cleaning up LLM-generated content, or auditing prose quality. Do not use when generating new content (use doc-generator) or learning writing styles (use style-learner).
Validates all artifacts are complete and consistent for release. Checks spec kit artifacts, documentation, versioning, and API docs. Run before creating a release to ensure nothing is missing.
Use before starting implementation - research repository documentation, codebase patterns, and external resources to inform the approach
Comprehensive repository analysis using Explore agents, web search, and Context7 to investigate codebase structure, technology stack, configuration, documentation quality, and provide actionable insights. Use this skill when asked to analyze, audit, investigate, or report on a repository or codebase. | Exploreエージェント、Web検索、Context7を用いた包括的なリポジトリ分析。コードベース構造、技術スタック、設定、ドキュメント品質を調査し、実用的な洞察を提供。リポジトリやコードベースの分析、監査、調査、レポート作成を依頼された場合に使用。
Core technical documentation writing principles for voice, tone, structure, and LLM-friendly patterns. Use when writing or reviewing any documentation.
Use when writing or reviewing k6 documentation across TypeScript types, user docs, and release notes.
Analyze repository structure, patterns, conventions, and documentation for understanding a new codebase
Reviews and proofreads blog posts, articles, documentation, communications, emails, and any other write-ups to improve conciseness, legibility, clarity, and tone. Fixes typos, grammar issues, redundancies, run-on sentences, and punctuation errors. Use when the user asks to proofread, review, edit, or improve a piece of writing, or when they share text and ask for feedback, corrections, or a revised version.
Go-specific code review with 6-phase methodology: Context, Automated Checks, Quality Analysis, Specific Analysis, Line-by-Line, Documentation. Use when reviewing Go code, PRs, or auditing Go codebases for quality and best practices. Use for "review Go", "Go PR", "check Go code", "Go quality", "review .go". Do NOT use for writing new Go code, debugging Go bugs, or refactoring -- use golang-general-engineer, systematic-debugging, or systematic-refactoring for those tasks.