Loading...
Loading...
Found 12 Skills
Laws of UX critique skill. Use when evaluating mockups, screenshots, design specs, prototypes, flows, onboarding, checkout, dashboards, forms, or design-review requests, even when the user does not say UX or name a law. Output the 2-4 most relevant laws with specific application and law-grounded recommendations. Do not use for pure frontend implementation code review, WCAG/accessibility audits, or brand/visual-identity critique unless interaction usability is also in scope.
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".
Use before building anything new or when a plan needs review. Not for bug fixes or small edits.
Critique UI/UX designs for clarity, hierarchy, interaction, accessibility, and craft. Use for design reviews, PR feedback on UI changes, evaluating mockups, checking if a component is ship-ready, or when honest feedback is needed on whether something meets a high bar.
Set up the Inflight feedback widget, authenticate with the CLI, and share staging URLs for design review. Use when the user wants to collect design feedback, add Inflight to a project, or share a staging deployment for review.
Pencil Design Skill for Team Workflows (Phase 2). Produce design.pen (or declare no UI design) based on requirements and plans, and prepare G2 design review materials.
Structure compelling design presentations for stakeholders, reviews, and showcases.
Analyze construction drawings to extract dimensions, annotations, symbols, and metadata. Support quantity takeoff and design review automation.
This skill analyzes code for design quality improvements across 8 dimensions: Naming, Object Calisthenics, Coupling & Cohesion, Immutability, Domain Integrity, Type System, Simplicity, and Performance. Ensures rigorous, evidence-based analysis by: (1) Understanding code flow first via implementation-analysis protocol, (2) Systematically evaluating each dimension with specific criteria, (3) Providing actionable findings with file:line references. Triggers when users request: code analysis, design review, refactoring opportunities, code quality assessment, architecture evaluation.
Surfaces and assesses hidden assumptions behind decisions, designs, or recurring patterns — use when reviewing a design before committing, reflecting on recurring problems, or questioning why the same kinds of issues keep appearing
Audit design documents for missing decisions, compatibility risks, rollout gaps, and observability omissions. Use whenever the user asks to review a design doc, architecture proposal, implementation-facing design, plan, or design-adjacent markdown file for completeness, migration strategy, rollback, data handling, or suggested additions without directly editing the document. Also trigger on short requests such as `review <file>.md` or `audit <file>.md` when the target looks like a design, plan, architecture, proposal, or decision document.
Three-phase design review. Chain architect → refiner → critique subagents. Triggers on: 'design review', 'architecture review', '/arc', system design proposals, significant refactoring decisions, new service or module design.