Loading...
Loading...
Found 5 Skills
Run structured multi-agent debates using argue CLI for cross-examined, high-confidence answers. Use when facing strategic decisions, ambiguous trade-offs, architecture debates, or questions where multiple perspectives improve the answer. Triggers on: argue, debate, cross-examine, second opinion, multi-agent, 'Should we X or Y?' with real stakes, consensus-building, risk analysis, or confirmation-bias mitigation.
Collaborative multi-agent planning with iterative deliberation. Use when creating complex plans that benefit from multiple specialist perspectives, cross-review, and consensus-building through discussion rounds.
Use when stakeholders have conflicting priorities and need alignment, suspect decision blind spots from single perspective, need to pressure-test proposals before presenting, want empathy for different viewpoints (eng vs PM vs legal vs user), building consensus across functions, evaluating tradeoffs with multi-dimensional impact, or when user mentions "what would X think", "stakeholder alignment", "see from their perspective", "blind spots", or "conflicting interests".
Evaluate complex requests from 3 independent perspectives (Creative, Pragmatic, Comprehensive), reach consensus, then produce complete outputs. Use for architecture decisions, creative content, analysis, and any task where multiple valid approaches exist.
Comprehensive multi-perspective review using specialized judges with debate and consensus building