Loading...
Loading...
Found 68 Skills
Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.
Comprehensive code review for diffs. Analyzes changed code for security vulnerabilities, anti-patterns, and quality issues. Auto-detects domain (frontend/backend) from file paths.
Evaluate Expo skills in this repo end-to-end - trigger accuracy, generated code quality, and runtime screenshots on iOS simulator and Android emulator via Expo Go (web optional). Use when the user wants to eval an Expo skill, test that a skill produces working code, benchmark a skill with device screenshots, or verify a skill's output renders correctly.
Review dependency PRs with structured research, existing-PR-discussion capture, multi-lens analysis (security, code quality, impact), and a repeatable verdict template. USE FOR: dependency update PRs, Renovate/Dependabot PRs, library upgrade reviews, "review this dependency PR", "should we merge this update". DO NOT USE FOR: feature PRs, application code reviews, dependency automation/bot configuration, or unattended merge without confirmation.
HarmonyOS code review skill for auditing ArkTS projects against official Huawei development guidelines and security best practices. Use when reviewing HarmonyOS applications for: (1) Security compliance (hardcoded credentials, encryption, input validation), (2) ArkTS language standards (hilog usage, type safety, magic numbers), (3) Component lifecycle management (resource cleanup, event subscription handling), (4) State management (V1/V2 decorator consistency), (5) Database operations (ResultSet handling, transaction management, encryption), (6) Permission management (official permission patterns), (7) Performance issues (async forEach, resource leaks), (8) API version compatibility, (9) Kit usage best practices. Generates comprehensive markdown reports with prioritized fix recommendations.
Structured review process for Remotion video implementations. Analyzes spec compliance, detects common timing/easing issues, validates asset quality, and provides prioritized revision lists. Use when reviewing Remotion code against design specs or performing quality assurance on video compositions. Trigger phrases "review video code", "check spec compliance", "audit Remotion implementation".
Run every Convex audit (authz, reviewer, advisor, insights) into one scored, deduped readiness report with an ordered fix plan — Lighthouse for your backend.
Use when working with performance testing review multi agent review
Review code for best practices, security issues, and potential bugs. Use when reviewing code changes, checking PRs, analyzing code quality, or performing security audits.
Reflect on previus response and output, based on Self-refinement framework for iterative improvement with complexity triage and verification
Systematically analyze codebase structure, complexity, dependencies, and architectural patterns to understand project organization
Code review of current git changes, compare to related plan if exists, identify bad engineering, over-engineering, or suboptimal solutions. Use when user asks to review changes, check git diff, validate implementation quality, or assess code changes.