Loading...
Loading...
Found 38 Skills
Comprehensive code review for diffs. Analyzes changed code for security vulnerabilities, anti-patterns, and quality issues. Auto-detects domain (frontend/backend) from file paths.
Review dependency PRs with structured research, existing-PR-discussion capture, multi-lens analysis (security, code quality, impact), and a repeatable verdict template. USE FOR: dependency update PRs, Renovate/Dependabot PRs, library upgrade reviews, "review this dependency PR", "should we merge this update". DO NOT USE FOR: feature PRs, application code reviews, dependency automation/bot configuration, or unattended merge without confirmation.
Comprehensive multi-perspective review using specialized judges with debate and consensus building
Automated code review for pull requests using specialized review patterns. Analyzes code for quality, security, performance, and best practices. Use when reviewing code changes, PRs, or doing code audits.
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.
Comprehensive quality auditing and evaluation of tools, frameworks, and systems against industry best practices with detailed scoring across 12 critical dimensions
Use when working with performance testing review multi agent review
API contract audit worker (L3). Checks layer leakage in method signatures, missing DTOs, entity leakage to API, inconsistent error contracts, redundant method overloads. Returns findings with 4-score model (compliance, completeness, quality, implementation).
Coordinates 9 specialized audit workers (security, build, architecture, code quality, dependencies, dead code, observability, concurrency, lifecycle). Researches best practices, delegates parallel audits, aggregates results into single Linear task in Epic 0.
Use when working with comprehensive review full review
Execute a complete, deterministic, read-only repository audit and produce a single `improvements.md` action plan with traceable findings (file + lines), severity, category, impact, and high-level fixes. Use when users ask for full code audits, security/performance/architecture reviews, file-by-file analysis, or technical debt mapping without modifying project files.
Review code for quality, security, and performance with comprehensive feedback.