Loading...
Loading...
Found 54 Skills
Comprehensive code review for diffs. Analyzes changed code for security vulnerabilities, anti-patterns, and quality issues. Auto-detects domain (frontend/backend) from file paths.
Review dependency PRs with structured research, existing-PR-discussion capture, multi-lens analysis (security, code quality, impact), and a repeatable verdict template. USE FOR: dependency update PRs, Renovate/Dependabot PRs, library upgrade reviews, "review this dependency PR", "should we merge this update". DO NOT USE FOR: feature PRs, application code reviews, dependency automation/bot configuration, or unattended merge without confirmation.
Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.
Structured review process for Remotion video implementations. Analyzes spec compliance, detects common timing/easing issues, validates asset quality, and provides prioritized revision lists. Use when reviewing Remotion code against design specs or performing quality assurance on video compositions. Trigger phrases "review video code", "check spec compliance", "audit Remotion implementation".
Assist developers in writing clean, maintainable code following software engineering best practices. Use when conducting code reviews, refactoring code, enforcing coding standards, seeking guidance on clean code principles, or integrating automated quality checks into development workflows.
AI-powered systematic codebase analysis. Combines mechanical structure extraction with Claude's semantic understanding to produce documentation that captures not just WHAT code does, but WHY it exists and HOW it fits into the system. Includes pattern recognition, red flag detection, flow tracing, and quality assessment. Use for codebase analysis, documentation generation, architecture understanding, or code review.
Use when working with performance testing review multi agent review
Technical solution evaluation and code review in the style of Linus Torvalds. Only use this when the user explicitly requests a Linus-style review or explicitly asks for a rigorous evaluation of code changes/technical solutions (e.g., "review changes/code", "evaluate if the solution is appropriate", "check submission standards", "linus-tech-review").
Coordinates 9 specialized audit workers (security, build, architecture, code quality, dependencies, dead code, observability, concurrency, lifecycle). Researches best practices, delegates parallel audits, aggregates results into single Linear task in Epic 0.
Systematically analyze codebase structure, complexity, dependencies, and architectural patterns to understand project organization
Use when working with error debugging multi agent review
API contract audit worker (L3). Checks layer leakage in method signatures, missing DTOs, entity leakage to API, inconsistent error contracts, redundant method overloads. Returns findings with 4-score model (compliance, completeness, quality, implementation).