Loading...
Loading...
Found 920 Skills
Baseline cross-project coding conventions for naming, readability, immutability, and code-quality review. Use detailed frontend or backend skills for framework-specific patterns.
Launch both thermo-nuclear review subagents in parallel, then synthesize their findings. Use for thermos, double thermo review, or combined bug/security and code-quality branch audits.
Detect AI-generated code patterns ("slop") in PHP/Laravel and TypeScript/React source — comment narration, generic naming, premature interfaces, defensive overdose, mock-everything tests, and the absence of human "scars". Use when reviewing AI-assisted PRs, auditing code for taste/quality (not metrics — that's technical-debt), or hardening a code-review checklist. Triggers on "review for AI slop", "find AI patterns", "check code feels human", "audit code-quality taste".
Maintain high code quality through formatting, linting, and static analysis. Use code-quality skill and scripts for rustfmt, clippy, or cargo audit.
Execute a single task from a Jira task plan using a structured pipeline of specialist subagents: planning, testing, refactoring, implementation, documentation, code-quality review, architecture review, security audit, and requirements verification. The user must specify which task number to execute. Use when the user says "execute task 3", "work on task 2", "implement task 1", "start task 5 for PROJECT-1234", or "run task N". Also triggered by the orchestrating-jira-workflow skill as Phase 5 of the end-to-end pipeline (called once per task). Requires that the task plan exists at docs/<TICKET_KEY>-tasks.md. Executes ONLY the specified task — never continues to the next one without explicit user approval.
Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.
Ultra-compressed code review comments. Cuts noise from PR feedback while preserving the actionable signal. Each comment is one line: location, problem, fix. Use when user says "review this PR", "code review", "review the diff", "/review", or invokes /caveman-review. Auto-triggers when reviewing pull requests.
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
Final quality pass before shipping. Fixes alignment, spacing, consistency, and detail issues that separate good from great.
Converts Stitch designs into modular Vite and React components using system-level networking and AST-based validation.
Set up Husky pre-commit hooks with lint-staged (Prettier), type checking, and tests in the current repo. Use when user wants to add pre-commit hooks, set up Husky, configure lint-staged, or add commit-time formatting/typechecking/testing.
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.