Loading...
Loading...
Found 18 Skills
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).
Verify claims in agent responses against sources using semantic similarity and web fact-checking.
Multi-source literature search, citation verification, MeSH search strategy, citation file management (.nbib/.ris/.bib conversion), and reference management (BibTeX, related articles, ID conversion) via MCP tools (PubMed, CrossRef, arXiv). Use when the user needs coordinated multi-step literature workflows beyond a single MCP call.
Generate and verify BibTeX entries from paper notes, writing `citations/ref.bib` and `citations/verified.jsonl`. **Trigger**: citation, BibTeX, ref.bib, verified.jsonl, references, 引用, 参考文献. **Use when**: 已有 `papers/paper_notes.jsonl`，需要为 prose/LaTeX 准备可追溯的引用（每条都有 url/date/title 验证记录）。 **Skip if**: 还没有 paper notes（或本次产出不需要引用/参考文献）。 **Network**: 自动验证通常需要网络；无网络时可先 record，再标注 needs manual verification。 **Guardrail**: 每个 BibTeX entry 必须对应一条 `citations/verified.jsonl` 记录；prose 只能使用已存在于 `citations/ref.bib` 的 citation keys。
Write publication-ready ML/AI papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use when drafting papers from research repos, conducting literature reviews, finding related work, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. Includes LaTeX templates, citation verification workflows, and paper discovery/evaluation criteria.
Conduct enterprise-grade research with multi-source synthesis, citation tracking, and verification. Use when user needs comprehensive analysis requiring 10+ sources, verified claims, or comparison of approaches. Triggers include "deep research", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "compare X vs Y", or "analyze trends". Do NOT use for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.
Use when deciding which paper-related skill to use or how to sequence manuscript work from project setup through submission and rebuttal.
Builds a structured literature review — survey of prior work, state of the art, related-work landscape — where every claim cites a verified reference. Use when the user says "literature review", "lit review", "survey the papers on X", "what's the state of the art", "synthesize prior work", or "organize these papers by theme". Composes sibling skills, search via find-papers (key-free DBLP/Crossref/Semantic Scholar/arXiv), full text via fetch-paper (legal open-access only), and citation checking via verify-citations. Tracks a screening corpus, extracts claims with section-level anchors, organizes by theme, and gates the final document with a deterministic checker so no claim ships uncited, unverified, or resting on a fabricated reference.
MCP server providing access to 41 Korean legal APIs (법제처) with citation verification, impact analysis, and time-travel diff capabilities
Drafts or revises a publication-ready research paper from RESEARCH.md, producing paper.md and refs.bib. Builds a clear claim-evidence narrative, writes in professional academic style, marks ungrounded claims [UNGROUNDED] and unverified citations [UNVERIFIED] inline, then auto-invokes review. Trigger phrases: "write paper", "draft paper", "revise paper", "start writing".
Audit CCF paper integrity: claim-support alignment, result-to-claim consistency, numeric consistency, terminology consistency, figure/table-to-text consistency, existing citation existence, BibTeX metadata, and citation-context support. Use for evidence audit, citation audit, consistency check, 引用核验, claim审计, 数字一致性. Do not perform full scientific review or broad literature search.
Turns a topic into a ranked reading list of the best papers plus a two-column, arXiv-ready literature-review/survey draft grounded in verified citations. Use when a researcher says "write a survey on X", "do a literature review of X", "give me a ranked reading list on X", "what should I read on X first", "draft a survey paper for arXiv", or "two-column related-work survey on X". Searches across DBLP/Crossref/Semantic Scholar/arXiv, ranks candidates by citation impact, venue strength, recency, and citation-graph centrality, clusters them into a taxonomy, verifies every reference, and writes an original-prose survey (intro, taxonomy, per-theme synthesis, open problems) where each claim cites a real, resolved paper. Never fabricates citations, never copies source text — original synthesis only; the author stays the author. Trigger words - survey, literature review, reading list, ranked papers, what to read, arxiv survey, two-column review.