Loading...
Loading...
Found 104 Skills
Maintainer workflow for reviewing, triaging, preparing, closing, or landing OpenClaw pull requests and related issues. Use when Codex needs to validate bug-fix claims, search for related issues or PRs, apply or recommend close/reason labels, prepare GitHub comments safely, check review-thread follow-up, or perform maintainer-style PR decision making before merge or closure.
Active coding loop — feature stages (brainstorm→plan→interface→tests→implement→improve→review→loop), red-green TDD execution, build-fix, deps-check, coding standards, bug-fix learning. Owns the canonical testing doctrine. Use when writing or changing code (backend, logic, APIs, libraries, CLIs).
Performs safe, behavior-preserving refactoring of C#/.NET code, verified with build, tests, and analyzers. USE FOR: rename or move a symbol/type/file; extract a method/type/interface; inline a wrapper/method/local; merge or consolidate near-identical classes or duplicate helpers; split or modernize C# code; generated/partial declarations; public, serialized, friend-assembly, or multi-targeted contracts; and mixed requests where a feature, bug fix, package/framework upgrade, public nullability change, or other behavior/contract change is presented as a refactor and must be separated or declined. DO NOT USE FOR: ordinary feature or bug-fix requests not framed as refactoring; upgrades after reclassification (use dotnet-upgrade); new tests; or formatting-only passes (use dotnet format).
8-step disciplined bug-fix protocol that treats every production bug as two failures — the code defect itself and the testing system that allowed it through. Use when fixing a production bug, investigating a regression, writing a post-mortem, or auditing a missed defect. Triggers on "fix this bug", "production bug", "regression test", "post-mortem", "test gap", "why did the tests miss this".
Record bug-fix decisions as Agent Notes bound to regression tests so AI-driven code changes cannot silently regress. Use when fixing a bug, reviewing a fix, verifying a notes tree, or asking when to write a postmortem. Do not use for general feature docs or changelogs.
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
Systematically debug code issues using proven methodologies. Use when encountering errors, unexpected behavior, or performance problems. Handles error analysis, root cause identification, debugging strategies, and fix verification.
Use this skill when writing code — building features, fixing bugs, refactoring, or any multi-step implementation work. Activates on mentions of implement, build this, code this, start coding, fix this bug, refactor, make changes, develop this feature, implementation plan, coding task, write the code, or start building.
Systematically find root causes and fix bugs. Use when debugging errors, investigating test failures, reproducing bugs from issue trackers (GitHub, Linear, Jira), or when stuck on a problem after failed fix attempts. Also use when the user says 'debug this', 'why is this failing', 'fix this bug', 'trace this error', or pastes stack traces, error messages, or issue references.
Run /debug to find and fix the root cause of a bug (something failing, broken, throwing, or behaving wrong) when a test fails for a reason that is not obvious, /check verify finds a failure, or behavior is unexpected. Runs a reproduce, localize, hypothesize, test, fix, verify loop, makes the minimal fix, and hands a regression test to /test. No features, no extra refactors.
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes - four-phase framework with built-in backward tracing for deep-stack failures, ensuring root-cause understanding before implementation
Write the test first, watch it fail, then write the least code that passes. Covers where the test belongs, what makes it honest, what a passing test proves and what it does not, recovering when code was written before the test, and starting a bug fix from a red run. A test nobody watched fail proves nothing. Use when implementing a feature or a bugfix, when a test was written after the code, when a test passes the first time you run it, or when the user says "write tests for this", "add coverage", or "TDD this". Not for judging tests inside a change under review, and not for choosing a test framework.