Loading...
Loading...
Found 6 Skills
Map a codebase into feature-grouped flowcharts, identify duplicated concerns across features, and propose a unified architecture. Use when asked to "find the ideal path," unify duplicated systems, or audit architecture before a refactor. Emits a proposed unified flowchart plus per-system /make-plan prompts.
Run comprehensive agent-native architecture review with scored principles
Reviews codebases, architectures, PRs, and technical plans for vanity engineering — code and systems built for the developer's ego, resume, or intellectual pleasure rather than delivering user or business value. Triggers on: "review this code", "is this over-engineered", "code review", "architecture review", "complexity audit", "vanity check", "is this necessary", "simplify this", "tech debt review", or any request to evaluate whether code or architecture is justified by actual requirements. Also trigger when the user shares a codebase and asks for feedback, when discussing framework/library choices, when reviewing PRs, or when someone is debating whether to refactor or rebuild. Nudge activation when you detect patterns of unnecessary abstraction, premature optimization, or resume-driven technology choices in code the user shares — even if they haven't asked for a vanity review.
Senior engineering analyst for code review, plan review, and automation review. Four-lens review covering architecture, code quality, reliability, and performance, each scored 1-10. Delivers APPROVE, REVISE, or REJECT verdicts. Use when you need a code review, plan review, quality check, or want to verify work before shipping. Part of the architect-system loop. Reads from system/blueprints/ and source code. Outputs to system/reviews/.
Use when the user asks for a broad codebase review, substantial PR/branch review, architecture audit, tech-debt scan, cleanup assessment, structural sanity check, or design-alignment review. Default workflow: use sub-agents when available unless specifically forbidden; do not require the user to mention sub-agents, council mode, delegation, or parallel review. Focus on cruft, duplication, weak boundaries, missed reuse, lifecycle/concurrency risks, test/roadmap drift, and code aesthetics. Do not use for narrow bug fixes, ordinary small-diff reviews, frontend visual QA, repo-onboarding docs, or OpenAI Agents SDK production-readiness review. Output evidence-backed findings first, then pressure points, design alignment, open questions, and follow-through.
Use this skill when the user asks for a review, audit, evaluation or analysis of a codebase, to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, or code quality concerns.