Loading...
Loading...
Found 5 Skills
Identify undefined areas in the current feature specification by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions, and encode the answers back into the specification. Trigger words include: "speckit-clarify", "speckit clarification", "specification clarification", "feature clarification", "identify ambiguities", "clarify requirements".
Use when a plan, PRD, or spec has vague requirements, undefined terms, or missing details - conducts structured interview using AskUserQuestion to surface hidden assumptions, challenge ambiguities, and produce implementation-ready specs. Also use proactively when encountering plans that say things like "make it faster" or "improve UX" without concrete definitions.
Clarify requirements before implementing by asking the minimum must-have questions. Use when a request is underspecified or ambiguous, when the user asks to “ask clarifying questions”, or when multiple plausible interpretations exist and you risk doing the wrong work.
Resolve implementation ambiguities before planning begins. Two modes: Discussion mode surfaces gray areas with concrete options for greenfield work. Assumptions mode reads the codebase, forms evidence-based opinions, and asks the user to correct only what's wrong (brownfield work). Use for "discuss ambiguities", "resolve gray areas", "clarify before planning", "assumptions mode", "what are the gray areas", "before we plan". Do NOT use for broad design exploration (use feature-design) or for planning itself (use feature-plan).
Guidance on when to ask clarifying questions vs proceed with standard approaches. Reduces interaction rounds while preventing wrong assumptions.