Loading...
Loading...
Found 5 Skills
Add one optional external Codex critique after the existing council has produced a decision draft. Use when an ambiguous, high-consequence decision would benefit from a separate model invocation's attempt to break the synthesis. Requires explicit consent before sending the compact draft and disagreement to OpenAI, labels same-provider reviews honestly, and marks the review absent when the adapter is unavailable.
Daily Review Assistant - An AI-assisted decision-making tool for cleaning up knowledge inboxes. The Agent provides "Keep/Delete" suggestions with reasons, and users manually execute after confirmation. Following the principle of "Collect without judging, make decisions during daily review", complete daily knowledge organization in 5-10 minutes. Triggers: /daily-review, /日清, /review
Run any question, plan, PR, or code through a Diverse Multi-Agent Debate (DMAD) council of 5 AI advisors with distinct reasoning methods. Advisors collaborate, peer-review each other anonymously, and a chairman synthesizes a verdict. Empirically outperforms adversarial debate (M3MADBench 2026, DMAD ICLR 2025). Use when: 'council this', 'run the council', 'council review', 'pressure-test this', 'stress-test this', 'war room this', or when facing a genuine decision with stakes and tradeoffs.
Multi-agent discussion rooms — debate or poll a problem from multiple perspectives. Standalone or invoked by other skills as a sub-routine. Mode=debate: N agents argue in rounds, converge. Mode=poll: N agents independently analyze, aggregate by consensus. Not for implementation (use system-architecture). Not for verification (use review-chain). For clarifying requirements first, see discover. For decomposing work after a decision, see task-breakdown.
/cs:cross-eval <memo> — Multi-model consensus on a board memo or strategy brief. Claude + Codex + Gemini cross-review with graceful degradation.