Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,945 Skills
Product idea generation and business validation specialist. Use when brainstorming ideas, validating business concepts, analyzing market opportunities, or evaluating product-market fit. Triggers on "idea generation", "business validation", "market analysis", "competitive research".
Comprehensive guide for implementing feature flags and A/B tests using the Flags SDK (the `flags` npm package). Use when: (1) Creating or declaring feature flags with `flag()`, (2) Setting up feature flag providers/adapters (Vercel, Statsig, LaunchDarkly, PostHog, GrowthBook, Hypertune, Edge Config, OpenFeature, Flagsmith, Reflag, Split, Optimizely, or custom adapters), (3) Implementing precompute patterns for static pages with feature flags, (4) Setting up evaluation context with `identify` and `dedupe`, (5) Integrating the Flags Explorer / Vercel Toolbar, (6) Working with feature flags in Next.js (App Router, Pages Router, Middleware) or SvelteKit, (7) Writing custom adapters, (8) Encrypting/decrypting flag values for the toolbar, (9) Any task involving the `flags`, `flags/next`, `flags/sveltekit`, `flags/react`, or `@flags-sdk/*` packages. Triggers on: feature flags, A/B testing, experimentation, flags SDK, flag adapters, precompute flags, Flags Explorer, feature gates, flag overrides.
Diagnoses what makes code complex and why, using the three-symptom two-root-cause framework. Use when code feels harder to work with than it should but the specific problem is unclear. This skill identifies WHETHER complexity exists and WHERE it comes from. Not for scanning a checklist of known design smells (use red-flags) or evaluating a specific module's depth (use deep-modules).
Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Practices: receiving feedback, requesting reviews, verification gates. Capabilities: technical evaluation, evidence-based claims, PR review, subagent-driven review, completion verification. Actions: review, evaluate, verify, validate code changes. Keywords: code review, PR review, pull request, technical feedback, review feedback, completion claim, verification, evidence-based, code quality, review request, technical rigor, subagent review, code-reviewer, review gate, merge criteria. Use when: receiving code review feedback, completing major features, making completion claims, requesting systematic reviews, validating before merge, preventing false completion claims.
Identify growth loops (flywheels) for sustainable traction. Evaluates 5 loop types: Viral, Usage, Collaboration, User-Generated, and Referral. Use when designing growth mechanisms, building product-led traction, or understanding how growth loops work.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze session", "세션 분석", "evaluate skill execution", "스킬 실행 검증", "check session logs", "로그 분석", provides a session ID with a skill path, or wants to verify that a skill executed correctly in a past session. Post-hoc analysis of Claude Code sessions to validate skill/agent/hook behavior against SKILL.md specifications.
Graduate a proven pattern from auto-memory (MEMORY.md) to CLAUDE.md or .claude/rules/ for permanent enforcement.
[WHAT] Universal content intake system for URLs (GitHub repos, YouTube videos, articles, PDFs) and skill packages (skills.sh, skill:// protocol) [HOW] Phase 1: Clone repos/fetch transcripts/scrape content/resolve skills to ~/lev/workshop/intake/. Phase 2-3: Load workshop/intake.md for full analysis [WHEN] Use when user provides a URL to analyze, says "intake/download", wants to evaluate external content, or references a skill package [WHY] Systematically evaluates external content and skill packages for adoption/adaptation with tier classification and ADR creation Triggers: "intake", "download", "analyze this url", "check out this repo", "review this video", "evaluate content", "install skill", "skill://"
Use when evaluating individual Xiaohongshu post performance, identifying what makes content succeed or fail, extracting viral content patterns, recognizing underperforming content that needs optimization, or comparing performance across different content types and formats
Scaffolds evaluation suites for the Axiom AI SDK. Generates eval files, scorers, flag schemas, and config from natural-language descriptions. Use when creating evals, writing scorers, setting up flag schemas, or configuring axiom.config.ts.
Generate contextual briefings for legal work — daily summary, topic research, or incident response. Use when starting your day and need a scan of legal-relevant items across email, calendar, and contracts, when researching a specific legal question across internal sources, or when a developing situation (data breach, litigation threat, regulatory inquiry) needs rapid context.
Use this skill when designing coding challenges, structuring system design interviews, building interview rubrics, calibrating evaluation criteria, or creating hiring loops. Triggers on interview question design, coding assessment creation, system design prompt writing, rubric building, interviewer training, candidate evaluation, and any task requiring structured technical assessment.