Loading...
Loading...
Found 198 Skills
Convert evidence gaps, conflicts, and anomalies into traceable candidate innovation points, and screen them based on contribution, feasibility, and falsifiability criteria. Use when the user asks for "finding research innovation points", "generating research directions from literature gaps", "screening candidate innovation points", "brainstorming research directions", or requests the rw-research-novelty workflow. Runs without a private local workspace or preset research-lab; use user-provided material and bundled public-source methods.
Review the accessibility, version, identifiers, restrictions, and statements of research data, code, and materials, and do not equate public availability with reusability. Use when the user asks for "check data availability", "write data availability statement", "check whether data, code, and materials are reusable", or requests the rw-research-data workflow. Runs without a private local workspace or preset research-lab; use user-provided material and bundled public-source methods.
Design and execute reproducible systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and other evidence synthesis processes. Use when the user asks for "conduct a systematic review", "how to conduct a scoping review", "design a screening process", or requests the rw-review-methods workflow. Runs without a private local workspace or preset research-lab; use user-provided material and bundled public-source methods.
Organize scientific research text based on user-provided research materials and verifiable sources, determine the writing functions of chapters, sections, and paragraphs, and fill in the gaps between evidence, explanations, significance, and research questions. Use when the user asks for “write PhD chapters”, “revise paper arguments”, “write academic paragraphs based on sources”, “revise scientific writing according to supervisor feedback”, or requests the rw-phd-write workflow. Runs without a private local workspace or preset research-lab; use user-provided material and bundled public-source methods.
Use when the user wants to summarize, analyze, or repurpose transcripts from TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, X/Twitter, LinkedIn, Rumble, or Reddit video posts. Extracts hooks, claims, quotes, content atoms, themes, and reusable scripts.
Expert guidance for distributed training with DeepSpeed - ZeRO optimization stages, pipeline parallelism, FP16/BF16/FP8, 1-bit Adam, sparse attention
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.
Systematic retrieval expert covering all areas of Chinese law. ## Core Features - Supports user identity recognition (ordinary person/law student/lawyer/judge/prosecutor) - Provides differentiated services based on different identities - Complete legal source retrieval (laws/administrative regulations/judicial interpretations/guiding cases/typical cases) - Original legal article citation and cross-reference sorting ## Core Trigger Conditions (Trigger if any is met) **High Priority (Must Trigger)**: - Explicit request to find legal articles/regulations/judicial interpretations/regulatory documents - Request to determine legality/illegality ("Is it illegal?""Is it legal?""Am I liable?") - Request to find compensation standards/compensation amounts/liability determination/procedural requirements - Asking "Based on which law?""What does the law stipulate?""What is the legal basis?" **Medium Priority (Trigger based on context)**: - "What to do?""How to defend rights?""Can I sue?" - "What procedures are needed?""What conditions are required?" - "What else can I claim?""Where can I file a complaint?" ## Application Scenarios - Labor disputes: illegal termination, economic compensation, work-related injuries, social security, job transfer, etc. - Contract disputes: deposit, liquidated damages, breach of contract liability, sales contracts, etc. - Tort liability: traffic accidents, personal injury, medical accidents, environmental pollution, etc. - Marriage and family: divorce property, child custody, estate inheritance, etc. - Administrative/criminal/corporate finance, etc. ## Non-Triggering Scenarios - Only asking about legal concepts/terminology explanations (not retrieval-related) - Only requesting lawyer/legal service recommendations - Only discussing legal news/case stories (not involving specific regulations) - Only asking about legal examination/study questions **Note**: Even if the user does not explicitly request a "retrieval report", this skill will be triggered as long as the issue involves searching, organizing, interpreting, or applying legal norms.
Use this skill for "review this paper", "review this manuscript", "peer review", "review my paper", "critique this manuscript", "review this submission", "give me feedback on my paper", "check my methods", "review my statistics", "review as a peer reviewer", "evaluate this manuscript", "review this PDF", or mentions manuscript review, peer review, paper critique, or methodological review.
Pre-submission checklist for LaTeX academic papers. Use when the user wants to submit a paper, check submission readiness, prepare camera-ready, switch to final mode, or verify a paper is ready for a conference deadline.
Initialize LaTeX Academic Project with standard structure, macros, and writing guide. Use when user wants to create a new LaTeX paper project for any conference or journal.
Build a retrospective or forward-looking work timeline from git commits, project docs, user notes, or chat records, then output a Markdown and/or HTML report with a Gantt chart or timeline visualization. Use when the user wants to review past work across one or more projects, explain time allocation to a mentor, summarize what was done in a period, or plan the next phase with a timeline.