Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,257 Skills
Use when the user asks for a broad codebase review, substantial PR/branch review, architecture audit, tech-debt scan, cleanup assessment, structural sanity check, or design-alignment review. Default workflow: use sub-agents when available unless specifically forbidden; do not require the user to mention sub-agents, council mode, delegation, or parallel review. Focus on cruft, duplication, weak boundaries, missed reuse, lifecycle/concurrency risks, test/roadmap drift, and code aesthetics. Do not use for narrow bug fixes, ordinary small-diff reviews, frontend visual QA, repo-onboarding docs, or OpenAI Agents SDK production-readiness review. Output evidence-backed findings first, then pressure points, design alignment, open questions, and follow-through.
Walk the user through a PR as a single top-to-bottom narrative ordered by dependency/causal flow, with a heavy scrutiny pass for bugs, missing tests, scope creep, and security. Operates on a temp git worktree so it works while the main working tree is dirty. Use when the user asks to review a PR, walk through a PR, review a PR, or review one branch against another.
Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart". Four LLM reviewers challenge changes from independent angles.
Provides comprehensive code review covering 6 focused aspects - architecture & design, code quality, security & dependencies, performance & scalability, testing coverage, and documentation & API design. Use this skill for deep analysis with actionable feedback after significant code changes.
Use when writing Move code on Sui to ensure 2024 edition syntax is used. Applies to method calls, string literals, vector operations, option handling, loops, and struct unpacking. Use whenever writing Move code to avoid legacy function-call syntax patterns.
Use this skill to run a multi-persona expert advisory review on a labelled pull request in microsoft/apm. The panel fans out to five mandatory specialists plus a test-coverage specialist (active on every PR that touches src/) plus two conditional specialists (auth, doc-writer), all running in their own agent threads, and a CEO synthesizer. The orchestrator is the sole writer to the PR: ONE recommendation comment, no verdict labels, no merge gating. The panel is advisory -- it surfaces findings, prioritizes follow-ups, and renders a ship-recommendation that the maintainer and author weigh. Activate when a non-trivial PR needs a cross-cutting recommendation (architecture, CLI logging, DevX UX, supply-chain security, growth/positioning, optionally auth, docs, and test coverage, with CEO arbitration).
Explain ABAP objects with full dependency context (via SAPContext) and optional ATC code quality analysis — replicates SAP Joule's "Explain Code" capability, including behavior definitions (BDEF — CRUD graph, determinations/validations, bound handler class). Use when asked to "explain this ABAP", "what does ZCL_X do", "walk me through this class/CDS view/behavior definition", or "review this object's quality".
Chinese Code Review Communication Reference - Script Templates, Priority Labeling (Must Fix/Suggested Change/For Reference Only), Countermeasures for Common Anti-patterns in Domestic Teams. Only invoke when the user explicitly uses /chinese-code-review, do not trigger automatically based on context.
Runs the jackin❯ release-readiness gates.
Use when performing a standalone PR double-check in a clean context — review, fix, and post.
Single adversarial review pass over the integrated branch diff — spec-compliance, code quality, and test adequacy judged together by one fresh-context reviewer. Triggers: /review, 'review the changes', or after delegation completes. Emits one verdict (reviews.review.status). Do NOT use for plan-review (that is its own dispatched gate) or for debugging.
Implement Git hooks using Husky, pre-commit, and custom scripts. Enforce code quality, linting, and testing before commits and pushes.