Loading...
Loading...
Found 136 Skills
Analyze user/customer feedback and produce a User Feedback Analysis Pack (source inventory, normalized feedback table, taxonomy/codebook, themes + evidence, recommendations, and feedback loop). Use for voice of customer, feature request analysis, support ticket synthesis, churn reason synthesis, and survey open-ends.
Smart contract and secure API contract security analysis — invariant checking, access control, reentrancy, and integer overflow patterns. Implements Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern, formal invariant verification, and OpenSCV vulnerability taxonomy for Solidity/EVM and Rust/Solana contracts.
Normalize terminology across a draft (canonical terms + synonym policy) without changing citations or meaning. **Trigger**: terminology, glossary, consistent terms, 术语统一, 统一叫法, 术语表. **Use when**: the draft has concept drift (same thing called 2–3 names) or global-review flags terminology inconsistency. **Skip if**: you are still changing the outline/taxonomy heavily (do that first). **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: do not add/remove citation keys; do not introduce new claims; avoid moving citations across subsections.
Quick pragmatic review of .NET test code for anti-patterns that undermine reliability and diagnostic value. Use when asked to review tests, find test problems, check test quality, or audit tests for common mistakes. Catches assertion gaps, flakiness indicators, over-mocking, naming issues, and structural problems with actionable fixes. Use for periodic test code reviews and PR feedback. For a deep formal audit based on academic test smell taxonomy, use exp-test-smell-detection instead. Works with MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, and TUnit.
Chief Customer Officer advisory for startups: retention decomposition (gross retention vs NRR honesty, churn root-cause taxonomy), customer segmentation strategy (differential investment across tiers + ICP fit scoring), CS team coverage model (pooled vs named CSM thresholds + ratio math), and CS team org evolution (CS vs Support vs AM distinctions). Use when designing retention strategy, segmenting customers for differential investment, sizing CS team, or sequencing CS hires. Strategic only — does not duplicate engineering/business-growth tactical skills.
Roblox AnalyticsService: custom events, economy tracking, funnels, rate limits, event taxonomy.
Comprehensive testing doctrine for software and AI systems — covers positive patterns, anti-patterns, gates for coding agents writing tests, CI discipline, and an LLM/agent evaluation primer. Use when authoring or reviewing tests, adding mocks, deciding test placement, generating tests via agents, debugging flaky CI, designing eval suites for LLM features, or rebuilding a brittle test suite. Contains 12 positive patterns (selector hierarchy, table-driven, builders, real-system gates), 25 anti-patterns across Brittleness, Flakiness, Mock-misuse, Process, and AI-specific families, 7 mandatory gates for agents writing tests, flaky-test taxonomy with quarantine workflow, contract / property / mutation testing patterns, and an oracle-ladder primer for LLM-as-judge and agent eval. Language-agnostic — pseudo-code only. Don't use for general code review, library-specific debugging unrelated to tests, non-testing CI pipeline design, or production observability.
Monitors task execution for skill improvement opportunities. Use this skill during ANY multi-step task, agentic workflow, or substantive work session where Claude is using tools and producing deliverables. It captures patterns, user corrections, workflow insights, and methodology worth preserving as reusable skills. Also triggers during post-task feedback discussions and when the user explicitly mentions skill observations, improvements, the observation log, skill taxonomy, or asks Claude to watch for skill opportunities. Also known as "One Skill to Rule Them All" — trigger on this phrase too. IMPORTANT: this skill should be invoked at the start of every task-oriented session — if you are about to use tools to produce deliverables, invoke this skill first.
Access protein metadata, function, taxonomy, and sequences across UniProtKB, UniParc, and UniRef. Use when searching for proteins, mapping identifiers, or retrieving functional annotations and publications. Don't use for sequence alignment, protein folding, or sequence similarity search (use specialized skills for those tasks).
Use when you need systematic extraction of pain points, feature gaps, switching triggers, and opportunities from reviews (B2B review sites, app stores, forums, communities, issue trackers). Includes bias hygiene, taxonomy building, triangulation, and turning insights into experiments.
Structured session analysis and project instruction refinement using a five-type intervention taxonomy (Correction, Repetition, Role Redirect, Frustration Escalation, Workaround) with severity scoring to categorize process gaps. Refines project instructions (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, .team/coordinator-instructions.md) with structural (not advisory) language, maintains WORKING_STATE.md for crash recovery (read-first-after-any- interruption protocol), and implements a self-reminder protocol (re-read constraints every 5-10 messages to prevent role drift). Includes advisory- to-structural promotion pattern for recurring gaps. Activate after milestones, repeated user corrections, session restarts, crash recovery, every 5 completed tasks, or on user request. Triggers on: "reflect on this session", "why do I keep correcting you", "update project instructions", "update working state", "session retrospective", "crash recovery", "context compaction", "role drift", "I keep telling you the same thing", "analyze my corrections". Also relevant when the agent notices repeated corrections, needs to resume after compaction, or wants to prevent known failure modes from recurring.
Turns a topic into a ranked reading list of the best papers plus a two-column, arXiv-ready literature-review/survey draft grounded in verified citations. Use when a researcher says "write a survey on X", "do a literature review of X", "give me a ranked reading list on X", "what should I read on X first", "draft a survey paper for arXiv", or "two-column related-work survey on X". Searches across DBLP/Crossref/Semantic Scholar/arXiv, ranks candidates by citation impact, venue strength, recency, and citation-graph centrality, clusters them into a taxonomy, verifies every reference, and writes an original-prose survey (intro, taxonomy, per-theme synthesis, open problems) where each claim cites a real, resolved paper. Never fabricates citations, never copies source text — original synthesis only; the author stays the author. Trigger words - survey, literature review, reading list, ranked papers, what to read, arxiv survey, two-column review.