Loading...
Loading...
Found 145 Skills
Evaluate every produced output (code, report, plan, data, API response) against type-specific quality criteria, score 1-10, make accept/reject decisions, and provide actionable improvement suggestions. Triggers on "evaluate", "check", "review", "quality control", "is this good enough", "score it", or before passing output to the next step in an agentic workflow.
Guides evaluation of RAG pipeline retrieval and generation quality. Use when evaluating a retrieval-augmented generation system, measuring retrieval quality, assessing generation faithfulness or relevance, generating synthetic QA pairs for retrieval testing, or optimizing chunking strategies.
[Trigger] When PPT workflow needs SVG slide quality review via Gemini. [Output] Structured review assessment with scores, pass/fail, and fix suggestions. [Skip] For content authoring or SVG generation tasks (those are handled by Claude). [Ask] No user input needed; invoked by review-core agent. [Resource Usage] Use references/, scripts/ (`scripts/invoke-gemini-ppt.ts`).
Review the code quality of a spec-driven change. Checks readability, security, performance, and best practices before archiving.
Execute a micro-level NestJS code quality audit. Validates code against live GitHub standards for testing, architecture, DTO validation, error handling, and code implementation. Produces a detailed violations report with prioritized action plan. Use when the user asks to check NestJS code quality, validate best practices, or review backend code standards. Triggers on: 'nestjs best practices', 'backend code quality', 'code review', 'nestjs standards', 'dto validation', 'error handling review'.
Agent skill for code-analyzer - invoke with $agent-code-analyzer
Calculate Cpk process capability index to assess whether a process meets specification requirements. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate process capability, compare processes, or determine if quality targets are achievable — even if they say 'can our process meet spec', 'process capability', or 'Cpk calculation'.
Review changes for regressions, contract mismatches, quality gaps, and missing validation evidence.
Assess documentation quality across readability, consistency, audience fit, and prose clarity. Produces a scored review with actionable findings. This skill should be used before releases, during doc reviews, or when documentation feels unclear or inconsistent.
Audits an existing pm-skills skill against structural conventions and quality criteria. Produces a structured validation report with pass/fail checks, severity-graded findings, and actionable recommendations. Use when checking whether a skill meets repo standards before shipping or after making changes.
Expert at analyzing documentation quality, coverage, and completeness. Auto-invokes when evaluating documentation health, checking documentation coverage, auditing existing docs, assessing documentation quality metrics, or analyzing how well code is documented. Provides frameworks for measuring documentation effectiveness.
Automatically detect code quality issues and provide improvement recommendations