Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,173 Skills
Clean Code principles (DRY, KISS, YAGNI), naming conventions, function design, and refactoring. Use when user says "clean this code", "refactor", "improve readability", or when reviewing code quality.
Delegate a task to Cursor's CLI agent (code review, Q&A, planning) for a second opinion from a non-Claude model
Render a PR diff review as a Cursor Canvas that groups changes by reviewer importance, separates boilerplate from core logic, and highlights tricky or unexpected code. Use when reviewing a pull request, summarizing a diff for review, or when the user asks for a PR review canvas, diff walkthrough, or change-set overview.
Review asynchronous Python code to identify race conditions, deadlocks, and inefficient patterns. Use when working with asyncio, aiohttp, or FastAPI.
Fetch and summarize review comments from the active pull request
Use when a code hotfix, rollback alternative, production/security/legal fix, launch blocker, or hard external deadline claims expedited review or relaxed process. TRIGGER on "emergency change", "hotfix", "prod incident", "major security hole", "must ship today", "hard deadline", "bypass review", or "fast-track this PR" for qualification only. DO NOT TRIGGER for ordinary urgency, soft deadlines, Friday timing, manager pressure, time-zone delay, or review unless emergency status is disputed.
Apply when reviewing or shaping code that's hard to trace. Count layers between question and answer, and hidden state in the reader's head; collapse one-caller wrappers and shrink mutable scope.
Use when reviewing a PR to tractorjuice/arc-kit that adds or extends a community jurisdictional overlay (e.g. au-*, ca-*, uae-*, fr-*, at-*, eu-*, future state-level like au-vic-*) — produces a structured review with blockers, important issues, minor issues, and positive callouts.
Review generated or changed WordPress code — plugins, themes, and blocks — before it ships. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, or reviews code touching WordPress APIs: add_action/add_filter, shortcodes, meta boxes, AJAX handlers, REST routes, WP_Query or $wpdb, widgets, or WP-CLI commands. Use on 'review this plugin', 'is this safe to ship', 'make this translatable', 'speed up this query', or after tasks like 'write a plugin' or 'add an endpoint/shortcode/meta box'. Enforces escaping and sanitization, nonces plus capability checks, prepared database queries, core-API-first development, translation-ready strings, and query/caching discipline. DO NOT USE for WooCommerce-specific order, product, or checkout logic (use woo-guard), non-WordPress PHP, generic code quality review (use clean-code-guard), test code review (use test-guard), server or hosting configuration, or conceptual WordPress questions.
Run a two-agent code review: spawn two fresh, clean-context agents that examine the SAME committed branch diff in parallel. One agent runs Codex's native `codex review --base` command, while the other independently reviews the code against Google's "What to look for in a code review" guidance. Merge both outputs into one agreement-ranked report. Use this whenever the user asks for "review-all", a second-opinion review, a dual review, a cross-check before a PR, or a maximum-confidence review of committed branch changes. Do not use it to APPLY fixes; it is review-only.
Find bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues in local branch changes. Use when asked to review changes, find bugs, security review, or audit code on the current branch.
Coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions with finding deduplication, severity calibration, and consolidated reporting. Use this skill when organizing multi-reviewer code reviews, calibrating finding severity, or consolidating review results.