Loading...
Loading...
Found 955 Skills
Automatically add or improve type annotations in legacy Python code. Use to improve code readability, IDE support, and catch type errors early.
Review GitHub pull requests with detailed, multi-perspective code analysis using parallel subagents. Use this skill whenever the user wants to review a PR, asks for code review on a pull request, mentions "review PR", "check this PR", "look at pull request", or references a PR number or GitHub PR URL. Also trigger when the user wants feedback on code changes, wants to approve or request changes on a PR, or asks to review someone's contribution.
Use when writing Move code on Sui to ensure 2024 edition syntax is used. Applies to method calls, string literals, vector operations, option handling, loops, and struct unpacking. Use whenever writing Move code to avoid legacy function-call syntax patterns.
Use when performing a CTO-level PR review — includes staging evidence gate for infra/backend PRs.
Use when performing a standalone PR double-check in a clean context — review, fix, and post.
Use when performing a first-pass, read-only PR review in a clean isolated context.
Code review of current git changes, compare to related plan if exists, identify bad engineering, over-engineering, or suboptimal solutions. Use when user asks to review changes, check git diff, validate implementation quality, or assess code changes.
Production-ready code implementation following approved designs. Writes clean, tested, documented code. Zero linting violations. All code includes tests.
A complete, opinionated development workflow skill for agents. Triggers when the user asks to implement a feature, fix a bug, or refactor code in a Git repo. Enforces hygiene, security, quality, and atomic commits.
Self-directed iterative research skill for Codex that continuously cycles through modify, verify, retain or discard, and repeat until a measurable goal is reached.
Fuzz React Doctor rules for crashes, slowness, false positives, and mutation-sensitive diagnostics with @react-doctor/fuzz. Use after rule tests pass, when investigating a fuzz finding, or whenever an eval, review, or user report confirms a new false positive.
Adversarial senior review of the spec before any code is written. Constructs a skeptical reviewer whose authority comes from the codebase, §R research, and live best-practice — then tries to REFUTE the spec, not rubber-stamp it. Every finding cites evidence (file:line or source); unverifiable ones are flagged. Survivors harden §V; the run ends in an explicit go / no-go gate. Triggers before building anything high-blast-radius, when the user says "review the spec", "red-team this", "is this plan sound", "senior review", or invokes /ck:review.