Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,263 Skills
Run Python (ruff) and JavaScript (Biome) linting, formatting, and code quality checks with auto-fix support. Use when code needs linting, formatting, or style checking before commits. Use for "lint", "format", "ruff", "biome", "code style", or "check quality". Do NOT use for comprehensive code review (use systematic-code-review).
This skill should be used when the user asks to "audit this codebase", "audit this code", "security audit", "code audit", "find vulnerabilities", "check for bugs", "review code quality", "find dead code", "check for anti-patterns", "performance audit", "check for code smells", "technical debt", or "code health check".
Run Gemini CLI review against the current branch and report only the review comments that are still valid for the current codebase, without applying fixes.
Generate a comprehensive Sentry bug report. Use when the user explicitly asks to "generate a bug report".
Full delivery pipeline: plan, build, ship, settle. Covers: shape/spec/design, TDD build, commit, PR creation, PR fix (CI/reviews/conflicts), PR polish, simplify, test coverage, verify ACs, walkthrough, issue management. Use when: shipping features, fixing PRs, creating PRs, building issues, simplifying code, checking quality, writing commits, managing issues. Trigger: /autopilot, /build, /shape, /commit, /issue, /check-quality, /test-coverage, /verify-ac, /pr-walkthrough.
Review changed code for reuse opportunities, quality issues, and inefficiencies using three parallel review agents, then fix any issues found. Triggers when the user says "simplify", "clean up the code", "review the changes", or after run-plan execution when code quality verification is needed.
Runs a second-pass cleanup over AI-written code using the repo's style guide in style.md. Prefers parallel subagents to simplify recently modified files without changing behavior. Use when the user says "deslop", "clean this up", "make this less AI", "apply my style guide", "second pass", or asks to simplify generated code after implementation.
Comprehensive Elixir/Phoenix code review with optional parallel agents
Umbrella skill for agent work discipline across development, analysis, and documentation: inspect the repo before restructuring, keep durable truth in repo artifacts instead of chat memory, co-evolve specs/design/steering/user docs with code, apply sound coding patterns, verify work honestly, avoid shortcuts, work efficiently with subagents without hallucinating, and keep moving through the next concrete work item when the human is away. References cover coding patterns, AI-authored code review, and artifact co-evolution. Trigger when the user asks for workflow discipline, coding patterns, doc/artifact maintenance, code review of AI-authored code, project hygiene, execution guardrails, repo normalization, or when a task risks drifting across architecture, storage, specs, continuity, or tooling boundaries.
Analyzes staged and unstaged files from the full working tree, groups them into functional clusters (test, docs, chore, directory prefix), generates a conventional commit message per group, detects common issues (secrets, debug statements, large files), and executes one commit per group sequentially after presenting a multi-commit plan for confirmation. Falls through to a single-commit flow when all detected files resolve to one group. Trigger: When the user says "commit", "smart commit", or /commit.
Aggressively clean up a codebase by removing AI slop, dead code, weak types, defensive over-engineering, duplication, and legacy cruft. Orchestrates 8 specialized subagents in parallel to deduplicate code, consolidate types, kill unused code, untangle circular dependencies, strengthen weak types, remove unnecessary try/catch, delete deprecated/legacy paths, and strip unhelpful comments. Use when the user asks to 'clean up the codebase', 'remove slop', 'improve code quality', 'remove dead code', 'kill AI slop', 'tighten types', 'remove legacy code', 'deduplicate code', 'DRY this up', 'untangle dependencies', or wants a thorough code quality pass. Also use when the user mentions code smells, technical debt cleanup, or refactoring for clarity — even if they don't use the word 'slop'.
Follow this sub-process for code optimization — handle tasks where 'behavior remains unchanged but structure changes' (structure / performance / readability). Shift single-module internal optimization from 'AI random refactoring' to 'first scan to generate a checklist, confirm each item with the user, execute step by step according to the method library, and obtain manual approval for each step'. Trigger scenarios: When the user mentions phrases like 'optimize / refactor / rewrite / split / poor performance / too long code' without any accompanying behavior changes. Do not handle new requirements (route to feature), bugs (route to issue), or cross-module architecture restructuring (route to architecture + decisions).