Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,173 Skills
Use when doing dev-stage self-review on the current branch before pushing or opening a PR — runs an auto-loop of codex review (cross-model, OpenAI) + per-finding fix + re-review until findings converge or stop conditions fire. Codex follows pr-review's multi-role methodology (security / staff-engineer / sdet / spec-auditor). Triggers — 'self review', 'self-review', '自己 review', '自我 review', 'cross-model review', 'pre-push review', 'review and fix my branch'. NOT for live PR review with sticky/inline comments (use pr-review), NOT for managed PR babysitting (use pr-babysit), NOT for first-time review without intent to fix (use mode=review-only opt-in).
Use when babysitting a PR/MR until CI is green and every valid reviewer feedback is addressed — supports GitHub PR (gh) and GitLab MR (glab), triages comments into Valid / Discuss / Out-of-scope, addresses valid items with small commits and inline thread replies, escalates invisible findings (SonarQube/Snyk dashboards) and 3-round bot deadlocks, reports ready-to-merge (never auto-merges). Triggers — '監看 PR', 'babysit PR/MR', 'PR 顧到 merge', 'address review feedback', 'wait until CI green', '把 PR 顧到綠'. NOT for writing PR descriptions, NOT for diff code review (use pr-review), NOT for actually merging the PR (user does that).
Cerrar e integrar el trabajo de una historia de usuario haciendo merge de la rama feature/US-XXX hacia la rama desde la que se creó, previa verificación de que progress.md tenga todas las tareas en Done. Activar cuando el usuario pida cerrar, entregar, mergear, integrar, finalizar o hacer submit del trabajo de una historia, una US o de la rama actual.
Review generated or changed production code before it ships, using Clean Code, SOLID, DRY, KISS, YAGNI, and LLM-specific failure-mode checks in any programming language. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, refactors, or fixes code, before presenting, committing, or merging the result. Use when the user asks "review this PR", "is this safe to merge?", "make this cleaner", "audit this code", "refactor this", "fix this bug", or after a coding agent produced implementation code. Can also guide writing when explicitly invoked before a risky edit. DO NOT USE for factual/conceptual questions, CI/tooling config, git workflow, running/debugging tests, pure architecture discussion, prose writing, data analysis, or test-code review (use test-guard).
Review the current Kelos branch, or an explicitly specified PR, issue, or diff, for Kubernetes API and CRD design quality. Use when asked for a Kelos API review, CRD/API compatibility review, Kubernetes API convention review, or review of changes under api/, generated CRDs, examples/, or self-development/ manifests. Default to the current branch when no target is specified. This skill is review-only.
Code quality improvement: review, refactoring, debugging. Phases: review feedback, systematic refactoring, root cause debugging, verification. Capabilities: SOLID/DRY compliance, code smell detection, complexity reduction, bug investigation, verification gates. Actions: review, refactor, debug, verify, validate code. Keywords: code review, refactor, debug, SOLID, DRY, code smell, bug fix, root cause, verification, technical debt, extract method, test failure, completion claim. Use when: reviewing code changes, improving code quality, fixing bugs, reducing technical debt, validating before merge/commit.
Help address review/issue comments on the open GitLab MR for the current branch using glab CLI. Use when the user wants help addressing review/issue comments on an open GitLab MR
Use after code review - implement ALL findings; any finding not fixed MUST have tracking issue created; no finding disappears without trace
High-velocity solo development workflow. Idea to production same-day. 9 commands: plan, spike, ship, review, spec-review, focus, done, drop, workflow. Auto-activates on: "plan", "spec", "ship", "spike", "spec-review", "review spec", "analyze spec", "challenge spec", "focus", "what should i do", "prioritize", "overwhelmed", "what should i work on", "done", "finish", "complete", "drop", "abandon", "workflow", "what's next", "whats next", "next step", "what now".
Validate skill directories against AgentSkills spec
Node.js backend expert including Express, NestJS, and async patterns
Evaluates student code submissions based on conceptual mastery rather than just correctness. Use to provide high-quality educational feedback on architectural patterns and programming logic.