Loading...
Loading...
Found 159 Skills
Build a retrospective or forward-looking work timeline from git commits, project docs, user notes, or chat records, then output a Markdown and/or HTML report with a Gantt chart or timeline visualization. Use when the user wants to review past work across one or more projects, explain time allocation to a mentor, summarize what was done in a period, or plan the next phase with a timeline.
Performs ARA Seal Level 2 semantic epistemic review on Agent-Native Research Artifacts, scoring six dimensions (evidence relevance, falsifiability, scope calibration, argument coherence, exploration integrity, methodological rigor) and producing a constructive, severity-ranked report with a Strong Accept-to-Reject recommendation. Use after Level 1 structural validation passes, when an ARA needs an objective epistemic critique before publication or release.
Use when migrating messy academic research repositories, downloaded archives, proposal folders, ad hoc notebooks, scripts, datasets, or paper assets into the standard research project structure.
Extract structured fields, original text locations, missing items, and supportable judgments from papers and supplementary materials. Use when the user asks for "extract this paper", "batch extract paper information", "create paper cards", or requests the rw-paper-extractor workflow. Runs without a private local workspace or preset research-lab; use user-provided material and bundled public-source methods.
Anthropic's method for training harmless AI through self-improvement. Two-phase approach - supervised learning with self-critique/revision, then RLAIF (RL from AI Feedback). Use for safety alignment, reducing harmful outputs without human labels. Powers Claude's safety system.
Conduct comprehensive literature reviews using multi-perspective dialogue simulation. Generate diverse expert personas, conduct grounded Q&A conversations, and synthesize findings into structured knowledge. Use when starting a new research project or writing a survey section.
Write Related Work sections that compare and contrast prior work with your approach. Organize by theme, cite broadly, and explain how your work differs. Use when writing or improving the Related Work section of a paper.
Provides guidance for automatically evolving and optimizing AI agents across any domain using LLM-driven evolution algorithms. Use when building self-improving agents, optimizing agent prompts and skills against benchmarks, or implementing automated agent evaluation loops.
Prepare a research artifact package for conference artifact evaluation, reproducibility review, badges, supplementary material, or post-acceptance artifact release. Use this skill whenever the user needs install instructions, reviewer-facing reproduction commands, Docker or environment checks, data/checkpoint packaging, hardware/runtime estimates, anonymized or public artifact metadata, artifact evaluation forms, or a claim-to-artifact reproducibility audit for ML/AI venues.
Turn a promising ML/AI research idea into a precise algorithm or method design before implementation. Use this skill whenever the user has an idea or project direction and wants to design the actual method, objective, architecture, inference procedure, assumptions, failure modes, ablations, implementation handoff, or method section plan before coding or experiment design.
Simulate target-conference reviewers for an ML/AI paper before submission. Use this skill whenever the user wants a reviewer-style critique, predicted scores, likely reject reasons, rebuttal risks, area-chair style meta-review, adversarial Reviewer 2 feedback, or venue-specific pre-review for conferences such as NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, CVPR, ACL, EMNLP, or similar venues. This skill should dynamically inspect reviewer guidelines, example reviews, accepted papers, and project evidence when available.
Run a pre-submission citation and reference audit for LaTeX academic papers. Use this skill whenever the user wants to verify that BibTeX entries are correct, every citation key in TeX resolves, every figure/table/equation/section reference is valid, DOI/arXiv/OpenReview/proceedings metadata matches the cited work, citation claims are supported by the cited paper, or a paper is ready for submission with clean references.