Loading...
Loading...
Found 198 Skills
Write high-quality bug reports that get fixed quickly. Use when reporting bugs, training teams on bug reporting, or establishing bug report standards.
10-parallel code/design review using reviewer subagents. Use when: - Running code reviews on PRs, commits, or branches - Running design reviews on issues or documents - Need multi-perspective review (security, architecture, code, QA, historian)
Establish design review gates with criteria, checklists, and approval workflows.
Multi-agent adversarial verification with convergence loop. Two independent review agents must both pass before output ships.
Fresh-subagent-per-task execution with two-stage review (ADR compliance + code quality). Use when an implementation plan exists with mostly independent tasks and you want quality gates between each. Use for "execute plan", "subagent", "dispatch tasks", or multi-task implementation runs. Do NOT use for single simple tasks, tightly coupled work needing shared context, or when the user wants manual review after each task.
AI-powered adversarial UI testing via the browse CLI. Analyzes git diffs to test only what changed, or explores the full app to find bugs. Tests functional correctness, accessibility, responsive layout, and UX heuristics. Use when the user asks to test UI changes, QA a pull request, audit accessibility, or run exploratory testing. Supports local browser (localhost) and remote Browserbase (deployed sites).
Load this skill when the user mentions `ulw` or `ultrawork`.
Watch for the 11 known AI-coding-agent failure modes (fabrication, scope_creep, security_vulnerability, etc.) — consult this skill before edits, dependency adds, completion claims, or anything that could trip a known supervision concern. Quote the snake_case failure-mode ids verbatim when flagging risks.
Iterative worker-reviewer cycle that spawns a critic subagent to score work 1-10 and provide actionable feedback, then revises until a quality gate is met. Use when implementing features, writing specs, reviewing existing code, or completing any task where quality matters more than speed. Trigger phrases: "use review-loop", "polish this", "iterate on this", "/review-loop", "review with feedback loop".
Review generated or changed WooCommerce code — extensions, payment and shipping integrations, checkout customizations, and order/product logic — before it ships. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, or reviews code touching WooCommerce APIs: wc_get_order, wc_get_orders, wc_get_product, WC() cart or session, woocommerce_* hooks, Store API endpoints, payment gateways, order or product meta, HPOS, subscriptions, or bookings. Use on 'review this Woo plugin', 'is this HPOS compatible', or after tasks like 'write a WooCommerce extension', 'add a checkout field', 'hook into the order flow', or 'update stock'. Enforces HPOS-safe order access, CRUD over direct meta, feature-compatibility declarations, server-side checkout validation, money-handling discipline, and hooks over template overrides. DO NOT USE for WordPress code without WooCommerce APIs (use wp-guard), generic code review (use clean-code-guard), test review (use test-guard), or store configuration and admin-screen questions.
Comprehensive checklist for conducting thorough code reviews covering functionality, security, performance, and maintainability
Comprehensive pre-merge validation checklist for Python/React pull requests. Use before approving or merging any PR. Covers code quality checks (linting, formatting, type checking), test coverage requirements, documentation updates, migration safety, API contract compatibility, accessibility compliance, bundle size impact, and deployment readiness. Provides a systematic checklist that ensures nothing is missed before merge. Does NOT cover security review depth (use code-review-security).