Loading...
Loading...
Found 141 Skills
Perform automated code reviews on GitLab merge requests. Analyzes code for style, bugs, security, performance, and error handling issues. Generates HTML report for easy reading.
Checkpoint - Pre-publish review with multi-layer deep analysis. Triggers: Preparing to publish an npm package, requiring pre-release review, or checking code change quality. Review Layers: - Per-Change: In-depth analysis of each change group (up to 10 Agents) - Holistic: Parallel review by 5 roles (Architecture/Development/Testing/Security/Documentation) - Synthesis: 1 Agent summarizes review results Commands: - /把关 - Start pre-publish review - /把关 check - Check unpublished changes - /把关 version - Recommend version upgrade - /把关 report - Generate review report - /review - English command Capabilities: Unpublished change detection, in-depth per-change analysis, multi-role review, version recommendation, release risk assessment.
Comprehensive Go backend code review with optional parallel agents
Evaluates Claude Agent Skills on 10 quality axes with letter grades (A+ through F) and specific improvement recommendations. Use when auditing a skill, comparing skills, prioritizing improvements, or performing quality control on a skill library. Activate on "grade skill", "evaluate skill", "skill quality", "skill audit", "skill review", "rate skill". NOT for creating skills (use skill-architect), grading code quality, or evaluating non-skill documents.
Objective task quality evaluation framework using quantitative KPIs. KPIs are automatically calculated by a hook when task files are modified and saved to TASK-XXX--kpi.json. Use when: reading KPI data for task evaluation, understanding quality metrics, deciding whether to iterate or approve based on data.
Evaluate the quality of CAW (Cobo Agentic Wallet) Agent in local Claude Code, and generate scoring data and analysis reports. Use when: Users want to run CAW evaluation, conduct evaluation, test Skill, assess Agent quality, generate evaluation reports, or say "run evaluation", "evaluate CAW", "eval", "score". For weak model / openclaw evaluation, please use caw-eval-openclaw (only installed on openclaw servers).
Review changes for regressions, contract mismatches, quality gaps, and missing validation evidence.
Deep diagnostic of Claude/SDD configuration. Read-only. Produces audit-report.md consumed by /project-fix. Trigger: /project-audit, audit project, review claude config, project health check.
Assess documentation quality across readability, consistency, audience fit, and prose clarity. Produces a scored review with actionable findings. This skill should be used before releases, during doc reviews, or when documentation feels unclear or inconsistent.
Performs ARA Seal Level 2 semantic epistemic review on Agent-Native Research Artifacts, scoring six dimensions (evidence relevance, falsifiability, scope calibration, argument coherence, exploration integrity, methodological rigor) and producing a constructive, severity-ranked report with a Strong Accept-to-Reject recommendation. Use after Level 1 structural validation passes, when an ARA needs an objective epistemic critique before publication or release.
Deep formal test smell audit based on academic research taxonomy (testsmells.org). Detects 19 categorized smell types — conditional logic, mystery guests, sensitive equality, eager tests, and more — with calibrated severity and research-backed remediation. Use for comprehensive test suite health assessments. For a quick pragmatic review, use test-anti-patterns instead. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new tests (use writing-mstest-tests), evaluating assertion quality specifically (use assertion-quality), or finding test duplication and boilerplate (use exp-test-maintainability).
Structural review of documents for gaps, clarity, completeness, and organization. Use when a brainstorm, plan, spec, ADR, or any doc needs polish before the next workflow step. For exploring new ideas from scratch, use brainstorming instead.