Loading...
Loading...
Found 109 Skills
Use when drafting, revising, structuring, reviewing, polishing, or preparing academic manuscripts, proposals, related work, LaTeX papers, abstracts, introductions, methods, limitations, or submission-ready scholarly text.
Drafts or revises a publication-ready research paper from RESEARCH.md, producing paper.md and refs.bib. Builds a clear claim-evidence narrative, writes in professional academic style, marks ungrounded claims [UNGROUNDED] and unverified citations [UNVERIFIED] inline, then auto-invokes review. Trigger phrases: "write paper", "draft paper", "revise paper", "start writing".
Use when the user wants to write, structure, or revise academic paper sections, improve notation consistency, or refine figures and tables. Triggers on phrases like "write the abstract", "structure the methods", "improve this section", "notation consistency", "figure refinement", or "paper structure".
Polish and rewrite the prose of academic LaTeX (.tex) files to sound professional and domain-appropriate, while leaving commands and structure intact.
Write PhD/Master's thesis — full chapter structure, literature review chapter, methodology chapter, results chapter, discussion chapter, and conclusion. Use when drafting thesis chapters, organizing thesis structure, or converting papers into thesis format.
Revise papers based on reviewer feedback. Map reviewer concerns to specific sections, apply targeted edits, run additional experiments if needed, and verify improvements. Use after receiving peer review with revision requests.
Akademiskt skrivande med vetenskaplig stringens — svenska eller engelska. [VAD] Uppsatser, rapporter, avhandlingar, litteraturöversikter, papers enligt högskolestandarder. IMRAD-struktur, Harvard/APA-referenshantering. Tvåspråkig skill. [NÄR] Use when: akademisk, vetenskaplig, uppsats, rapport, avhandling, litteraturöversikt, forskningstext, Harvard-referens, APA-referens, kandidat, master, doktorand, paper, thesis [SPRÅK] Svenska eller engelska — matcha input eller fråga [EXPERTISE] Academic writing, methodology, source criticism, qualitative/quantitative (SV/EN)
Comprehensive academic textbook chapter writing system for medical/scientific content. Use when the user wants to: (1) Write a full textbook chapter (5,000-15,000 words) on any medical/scientific topic, (2) Generate a detailed table of contents with section word counts, (3) Research topics via PubMed MCP and compile 20-30 references, (4) Write section-by-section with proper citations in Vancouver format, (5) Create publishable academic content with Eric Topol-inspired voice and authentic human prose, (6) Get approval at TOC stage before writing begins, (7) Export well-structured chapters for textbook publication.
Expert-level academic research and LaTeX paper writing with IEEE/APA citation support. Creates peer-reviewed research papers, literature reviews, and theses with proper scholarly standards.
Generate publication-quality figures and tables from experiment results. Use when user says "画图", "作图", "generate figures", "paper figures", or needs plots for a paper.
Use when the user needs research methodology, long-form content creation, academic-style citations, fact-checking, or evidence-based writing with proper source attribution. Trigger conditions: whitepaper drafting, research article writing, source evaluation, citation management, fact-checking protocol, case study creation, evidence-based argumentation.
Systematic pre-publication manuscript audit producing a structured refactoring report with section-level diagnostics, citation hygiene analysis, and submission-readiness assessment. Use this skill whenever the user uploads a manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, journal submission, or conference paper and asks for review, feedback, editing, refactoring, pre-submission check, proofreading, or quality audit. Also trigger when the user says "review my paper", "check before submission", "is this ready to submit", "pre-pub checklist", "manuscript review", "refactor my paper", or asks about citation consistency, argument coherence, or formatting compliance. Covers partial requests like "check my references" or "does the abstract work" — the full diagnostic surfaces issues across all facets even when only one was asked about.