Loading...
Loading...
Found 78 Skills
Performs evidence-based refactoring research for a user-specified code, component, or subsystem. Produces an As Is analysis and a minimal, justified To Be proposal with naming, dependency, migration, and trade-off recommendations. Applies SOLID, KISS, YAGNI, BDUF, APO, Occam's Razor, DRY, Law of Demeter, and composition over inheritance. Analysis only; does not implement changes. Invoked manually only.
Review generated or changed production code before it ships, using Clean Code, SOLID, DRY, KISS, YAGNI, and LLM-specific failure-mode checks in any programming language. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, refactors, or fixes code, before presenting, committing, or merging the result. Use when the user asks "review this PR", "is this safe to merge?", "make this cleaner", "audit this code", "refactor this", "fix this bug", or after a coding agent produced implementation code. Can also guide writing when explicitly invoked before a risky edit. DO NOT USE for factual/conceptual questions, CI/tooling config, git workflow, running/debugging tests, pure architecture discussion, prose writing, data analysis, or test-code review (use test-guard).
MUST be used whenever reviewing a Dune app for code quality, maintainability, or clean code issues — before a PR review, after a feature is complete, or when the user asks for a code review. Do NOT skip linting steps. Triggers: code quality, code review, clean code, refactor, maintainability, technical debt, any type, naming, dead code, duplication, DRY, single responsibility, component size, lint, linting, TypeScript strict, dependency injection, file structure.
This skill analyzes code for design quality improvements across 8 dimensions: Naming, Object Calisthenics, Coupling & Cohesion, Immutability, Domain Integrity, Type System, Simplicity, and Performance. Ensures rigorous, evidence-based analysis by: (1) Understanding code flow first via implementation-analysis protocol, (2) Systematically evaluating each dimension with specific criteria, (3) Providing actionable findings with file:line references. Triggers when users request: code analysis, design review, refactoring opportunities, code quality assessment, architecture evaluation.
Use when writing, fixing, or editing TypeScript comments or TSDoc, especially commented-out code, stale docs, metadata comments, redundant comments, TODO banners, or unclear comment value.
Backend code quality for clean, production-ready, maintainable code. Adapts to the existing language, framework, and style. Covers functions, reusability, modern syntax, error prevention, readability, and security awareness. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring backend code for quality, maintainability, or production readiness.