Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,194 Skills
Use this skill to review pull requests against coding standards and best practices. Invoke when reviewing code changes before merge.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "add mypy to a project", "set up static type checking", "fix mypy errors", "configure mypy", "annotate Python code with types", or needs guidance on Python type checking best practices with mypy.
Use this skill when the user asks to review their local git changes, staged or unstaged diffs, or wants a code review before committing. Triggers on "review my changes", "review staged", "review my diff", "check my code", "code review local changes", "review unstaged", "review before commit".
Review and simplify recently changed code for reuse, clarity, and efficiency while preserving behavior. Use when the user asks to simplify, refine, polish, clean up, or make code clearer, after finishing a logical chunk of implementation that should be tightened before commit, or when asked to review changes since a specific commit or branch.
Validates recently written code against project-specific development guidelines from .trellis/spec/. Identifies changed files via git diff, discovers applicable spec modules, runs lint and typecheck, and reports guideline violations. Use when code is written and needs quality verification, to catch context drift during long sessions, or before committing changes.
Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Four phases: investigate, analyze, hypothesize, implement. Iron Law: no fixes without root cause. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this broken", "investigate this error", or "root cause analysis". Proactively suggest when the user reports errors, unexpected behavior, or is troubleshooting why something stopped working.
Run comprehensive 3-wave review against all source files in the repo, producing a prioritized issue backlog. Use for "full repo review", "review entire repo", "codebase health check", "review all files", "full codebase review". Do NOT use for PR-scoped reviews (use comprehensive-review) or single-concern reviews (use individual agents).
Gold-standard code review for SAP CC Go repositories against the project's lead review standards. Dispatches 10 domain-specialist agents in parallel — each loads domain-specific references and scans ALL packages for violations in their assigned domain. Produces a prioritized report with REJECTED/CORRECT code examples. Optional --fix mode applies corrections on a worktree branch. This is the definitive "would this code pass lead review?" assessment.
Fetch PR feedback from all GitHub sources and validate every comment before acting. Use when user needs to process PR review comments, address reviewer feedback, or triage pull request discussions. Use for "review comments", "PR feedback", "address reviews", "address feedback", or "what did reviewers say". Do NOT use for creating new PRs, code review of local changes, or general code analysis without an existing PR.
Verify cross-component wiring: exports are imported AND used, real data flows through connections, output shapes match input expectations. Use after /feature-implement, before /feature-validate, or standalone on any codebase. Use for "check integration", "verify wiring", "are components connected", "integration check", or "/integration-checker". Do NOT use for unit test failures, linting, or single-file correctness issues.
Review the code quality of a spec-driven change. Checks readability, security, performance, and best practices before archiving.
Execute a comprehensive NestJS Project Health Audit. Analyzes tech stack, architecture, API design, data layer, testing, code quality, CI/CD, and documentation. Produces a Google Docs-ready report with section scores and weighted overall score. Use when the user asks to audit a NestJS project, run a health check, evaluate backend quality, or assess technical debt. Triggers on: 'nestjs audit', 'health audit', 'backend audit', 'nestjs health', 'node audit', 'api audit', 'project quality check'.