Loading...
Loading...
Found 955 Skills
Use when a PR is submitted and ready for peer review, to evaluate another agent's work against task requirements and code quality standards
Use when naming or renaming TypeScript identifiers, especially cryptic names, ambiguous parameters, I-prefixed interfaces, Hungarian notation, misleading side effects, or requests for clearer names.
Use when about to submit work, before committing or pushing, to run verification commands and confirm the work actually passes before claiming completion
Weekly engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics with persistent history and trend tracking. Team-aware with per-person contributions, praise, and growth areas. Use when asked for weekly retro, what shipped this week, or engineering retrospective.
Performs a structured code review on the current diff or specified files. Checks for correctness, security vulnerabilities, test coverage, code style, and adherence to the project's architecture patterns. Invoked when the user asks for a review, code check, pr review, or quality assessment.
Use this skill when > Configure automated code quality checks at commit time using Husky and lint-staged. Sets up pre-commit hooks for formatting (Prettier), type checking, and tests. Adapts to existing project configurations and omits missing scripts gracefully.
Compares competing PRs that target the same issue and recommends which one to merge. Runs gate, correctness, and quality checks; outputs a deterministic scorecard with reasoning trace. Use when an issue has two or more open PRs and a maintainer needs to decide which to merge.
Apply when debugging. Trace each symptom to its root cause and fix it there; reproduce first, ask why until you reach it, resist nil-check guards that silence crashes.
Comprehensive Rust code review across four lenses — source code (ownership, borrowing, lifetimes, errors, trait design, unsafe, common mistakes), tests (unit, integration, async testing, mocking, property-based), tokio async (task management, sync primitives, channels), and FFI (extern blocks,
Findings-first review discipline for code, diffs, task plans, live workflow changes, and implementation evidence.
Use when writing or reviewing Move smart contracts on Sui. Applies to naming structs, error constants, regular constants, events, getter functions, capability types, hot potato types, and dynamic field keys. Use whenever creating new types, functions, or constants in Move code.
Owns Python code style for this stack: ruff for lint + format, numpydoc for docstrings. Two responsibilities — (1) place the project's `ruff.toml` from the bundled template once the stack and workspace are in place, and (2) run ruff against any Python files Claude has just generated or edited. Stops at "the touched files pass `ruff check`." TRIGGER when (any of these): (1) a Python file was just created or edited via Write / Edit / MultiEdit — invoke this skill before declaring the task done so ruff is run on the touched files; (2) a fresh ML workspace was just scaffolded by `organize-ml-workspace` and the project has no `ruff.toml` at its root yet — drop the bundled template; (3) the user asks about lint, format, docstring style, or reaches for `black` / `isort` / `flake8` / `pydocstyle` (redirect to ruff — the stack's canonical linter, owned by `data-science-python-stack` Tier 1). SKIP when: the project is non-Python; the only edits in this turn are to Markdown / TOML / JSON / YAML; the file lives in a third-party vendored directory the user doesn't own. HOW TO USE: run ruff manually on the files you just touched — do not configure a PostToolUse hook for this. **Read the "Stop conditions" block and emit the Pre-flight checklist as visible text in your response — both are mandatory before running ruff.**