Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,283 Skills
Multi-agent QA review team for code changes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "review my code", "run QA", "qa-team", "review this branch", "code review", "check my changes", or wants a comprehensive multi-perspective code review of the current branch's changes. Spawns parallel specialist agents (security, database, reliability, compatibility, data integrity, performance, frontend, copy) that independently review the diff and produce a converged report. Also includes two generalist reviewers for convergence validation.
Audit and improve SwiftUI runtime performance from code review and architecture. Use for requests to diagnose slow rendering, janky scrolling, high CPU/memory usage, excessive view updates, or layout thrash in SwiftUI apps, and to provide guidance for user-run Instruments profiling when code review alone is insufficient.
Detects framework-specific anti-patterns, convention violations, and idiom misuse across PHP/Laravel, React/Next.js, and Python/Django/FastAPI codebases. Loads framework-specific reference guides and checks against framework conventions. Generates severity-scored findings with copy-pasteable fix prompts. Trigger phrases: "framework review", "framework check", "laravel best practices", "react best practices", "framework audit", "framework-specific review".
Audit animation code against Disney's 12 principles adapted for web. Use when reviewing motion, implementing animations, or checking animation quality. Outputs file:line findings.
Review the diff between the current branch and main as a senior developer. Analyzes architecture, coding standards, security, performance, and correctness. Use when user says 'review my code', 'pre-PR review', 'review diff', 'code review before PR', 'check my changes', or 'senior review'. Do NOT use for only running tests (use a test skill), only linting (use a lint skill), or full PR preparation (use create-pr).
Delegate a task to Cursor's CLI agent (code review, Q&A, planning) for a second opinion from a non-Claude model
Use when drafting, rewriting, classifying, or improving code review comments as a reviewer. TRIGGER on rough review notes, requests to make comments clearer or kinder, severity labels, "how should I phrase this review comment?", "write review comments", author pushback, or turning findings into PR comments. If role is unclear, ask reviewer or author. DO NOT TRIGGER for full code review, PR descriptions, or author responses unless wording is requested.
Fetch unresolved review comments from a GitHub PR or mark comments as resolved. Use this when managing PR review feedback, checking pending comments, or marking review threads as resolved. Supports GitHub URLs or explicit owner/repo/PR-number from anywhere, or PR number auto-detection from within a git repository.
Use when reviewing a PR to tractorjuice/arc-kit that adds or extends a community jurisdictional overlay (e.g. au-*, ca-*, uae-*, fr-*, at-*, eu-*, future state-level like au-vic-*) — produces a structured review with blockers, important issues, minor issues, and positive callouts.
Route a full Blazor work request across the appropriate specialist lane(s). Use when the request spans more than one concern (authoring, data, auth, review) or when lane selection itself is uncertain. Triggers on full-request phrasing: "implement this feature", "review and refactor this page", "build this form end-to-end". Distinct from blazor-component-architect (user-level, external, single-lane authoring guidance that may be invoked as a specialist resource).
Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code for maintainability and readability. Triggers on code reviews, naming discussions, function design, error handling, and test writing. Based on Robert C. Martin's Clean Code handbook.
Coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions with finding deduplication, severity calibration, and consolidated reporting. Use this skill when organizing multi-reviewer code reviews, calibrating finding severity, or consolidating review results.