Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,944 Skills
Clarify or discuss a proposed task, plan, design update, or ADR by resolving the highest-value unresolved decisions, decision criteria, trade-offs, and option boundaries until the inputs are ready for task creation, task planning, task/design updates, ADR writing, or safe implementation continuation. Use this as the default path when the user asks to clarify, discuss criteria, compare options, stress-test a design, or otherwise resolve material unresolved questions before proceeding. When clarification ends, resume the invoking workflow. It may also be used for general grilling when explicitly selected or when no other default grilling skill is available.
SegFormer for semantic segmentation. Lightweight transformer-based architecture with hierarchical feature extraction, efficient for real-time segmentation tasks. Use when training, evaluating, exporting, quantizing, or running inference for a TAO SegFormer model. Trigger phrases include "train SegFormer", "semantic segmentation", "lightweight transformer segmenter", "real-time semantic segmentation".
Identifies error-prone APIs, dangerous configurations, and footgun designs that enable security mistakes. Use when reviewing API designs, configuration schemas, cryptographic library ergonomics, or evaluating whether code follows 'secure by default' and 'pit of success' principles. Triggers: footgun, misuse-resistant, secure defaults, API usability, dangerous configuration.
Add headless Chrome automation with Puppeteer/Playwright on Cloudflare Workers. Use when: taking screenshots, generating PDFs, web scraping, crawling sites, browser automation, or troubleshooting XPath errors, browser timeouts, binding not passed errors, session limits, page.evaluate __name errors, or waitForSelector timeout issues.
Help users run effective design reviews and critiques. Use when someone is giving design feedback, establishing design review processes, struggling to evaluate designs, or wants to improve how their team discusses design work.
Package entire code repositories into single AI-friendly files using Repomix. Capabilities include pack codebases with customizable include/exclude patterns, generate multiple output formats (XML, Markdown, plain text), preserve file structure and context, optimize for AI consumption with token counting, filter by file types and directories, add custom headers and summaries. Use when packaging codebases for AI analysis, creating repository snapshots for LLM context, analyzing third-party libraries, preparing for security audits, generating documentation context, or evaluating unfamiliar codebases.
AI-agent readiness auditing for project documentation and workflows. Evaluates whether future Claude Code sessions can understand docs, execute workflows literally, and resume work effectively. Use when onboarding AI agents to a project or ensuring context continuity. Includes three specialized agents: context-auditor (AI-readability), workflow-validator (process executability), handoff-checker (session continuity). Use PROACTIVELY before handing off projects to other AI sessions or team members.
Analyzes events through cybersecurity lens using threat modeling, attack surface analysis, defense-in-depth, zero-trust architecture, and risk-based frameworks (CIA triad, STRIDE, MITRE ATT&CK). Provides insights on vulnerabilities, attack vectors, defense strategies, incident response, and security posture. Use when: Security incidents, vulnerability assessments, threat analysis, security architecture, compliance. Evaluates: Confidentiality, integrity, availability, threat actors, attack patterns, controls, residual risk.
Reviews and improves Claude Code skills against official best practices. Supports three modes - self-review (validate your own skills), external review (evaluate others' skills), and auto-PR (fork, improve, submit). Use when checking skill quality, reviewing skill repositories, or contributing improvements to open-source skills.
Provide structured code review guidance for catching defects and improving quality. This skill should be used when the user asks to 'review this code', 'check for issues', 'PR review', 'code quality check', or wants systematic code evaluation. Keywords: code review, PR, pull request, quality, defects, security, maintainability, performance.
Analyzes fundamental questions and concepts through philosophical lens using logic, epistemology, metaphysics, and critical analysis frameworks. Provides insights on meaning, truth, knowledge, existence, reasoning, and conceptual clarity. Use when: Conceptual ambiguity, logical arguments, foundational assumptions, meaning questions. Evaluates: Validity, soundness, coherence, assumptions, implications, conceptual clarity.
This skill should be used when scientists need help with research problem selection, project ideation, troubleshooting stuck projects, or strategic scientific decisions. Use this skill when users ask to pitch a new research idea, work through a project problem, evaluate project risks, plan research strategy, navigate decision trees, or get help choosing what scientific problem to work on. Typical requests include "I have an idea for a project", "I'm stuck on my research", "help me evaluate this project", "what should I work on", or "I need strategic advice about my research".