Loading...
Loading...
Found 74 Skills
Executes large-scale architectural refactoring and technical debt reduction across the entire codebase. Ensures consistency with modern design patterns.
Technical leadership advisor for CTOs on architecture decisions, engineering strategy, team scaling, technical debt management, and technology evaluation.
This skill should be used when analyzing technical debt in a codebase, documenting code quality issues, creating technical debt registers, or assessing code maintainability. Use this for identifying code smells, architectural issues, dependency problems, missing documentation, security vulnerabilities, and creating comprehensive technical debt documentation.
Comprehensive code review with parallel specialist sub-agents. Analyzes requirements traceability, code quality, security, performance, accessibility, test coverage, and technical debt. Produces detailed findings and calls /qa-gate for final gate decision.
Apply systematic code refactoring with small steps, clear boundaries, and proven techniques. Use when improving existing code, reducing technical debt, cleaning up legacy code, or when user mentions refactoring, code cleanup, or code improvement.
Apply named refactoring transformations to improve code structure without changing behavior. Use when the user mentions "refactor this", "code smells", "extract method", "replace conditional", or "technical debt". Covers smell-driven refactoring, safe transformation sequences, and testing guards. For code quality foundations, see clean-code. For managing complexity, see software-design-philosophy.
Systematic code refactoring following Martin Fowler's catalog. Methodologies: characterization tests, Red-Green-Refactor, incremental transformation. Capabilities: SOLID compliance, DRY cleanup, code smell detection, complexity reduction, legacy modernization, design patterns, functional programming patterns. Actions: refactor, extract, inline, rename, move, simplify code. Keywords: refactor, SOLID, DRY, code smell, complexity, extract method, inline, rename, move, clean code, technical debt, legacy code, design pattern, characterization test, Red-Green-Refactor, functional programming, higher-order function, immutability, pure function, composition, currying, side effects. Use when: improving code quality, reducing technical debt, applying SOLID principles, fixing DRY violations, removing code smells, modernizing legacy code, applying design patterns.
Automate lifecycle checks for migration code (TODO(migration)). Detect expired or insufficiently documented migration code and output results in report format. It is used for checking remaining TODO(migration) entries in the codebase, cleaning up expired migration code, and taking inventory of technical debt. This is a mechanism to prevent leaving "to be deleted later" code unattended.
Analyzes code complexity, technical debt, and industry trends to propose a 3-month strategic roadmap. Aligns engineering effort with business ROI.
Invoke IMMEDIATELY via python script when user requests refactoring analysis, technical debt review, or code quality improvement. Do NOT explore first - the script orchestrates exploration.
Use when adding, retiring, or auditing feature flags. Triggers on "add a flag", "ship behind a flag", "rollout plan", "kill switch", "stale flags", "flag debt", "LaunchDarkly", "GrowthBook", "Statsig", "Unleash", "Flipt", or any progressive-delivery question. Ships flag debt scanner, rollout planner, and kill-switch auditor (all stdlib Python), 4 references on flag taxonomy + provider trade-offs + rollout strategies + lifecycle, plus a /flag-cleanup slash command.
Clean up code, remove dead code, and optimize project structure. Use when user wants to clean codebase, remove unused code, or optimize imports.