Loading...
Loading...
Found 74 Skills
Generate publication-quality scientific figures using matplotlib/seaborn with a three-phase pipeline (query expansion, code generation with execution, VLM visual feedback). Handles bar charts, line plots, heatmaps, training curves, ablation plots, and more. Use when the user needs figures, plots, or visualizations for a paper.
Comprehensive toolkit for writing high-quality computer science research papers (conference, journal, thesis). Provides narrative construction guidance, sentence-level clarity principles (Gopen & Swan), academic phrasebank, CS-specific conventions, and section-by-section quality checklists. Use when assisting with academic paper writing, revision, or structure planning across all stages from drafting to submission.
Systematic framework for evaluating scholarly and research work based on the ScholarEval methodology. This skill should be used when assessing research papers, evaluating literature reviews, scoring research methodologies, analyzing scientific writing quality, or applying structured evaluation criteria to academic work. Provides comprehensive assessment across multiple dimensions including problem formulation, literature review, methodology, data collection, analysis, results interpretation, and scholarly writing quality.
Make a demo of a research paper in a marimo notebook fully automatically without extra user input.
Search arXiv preprint repository for papers in physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, and related fields
Write ML experiment code with iterative improvement. Generate training/evaluation pipelines, debug errors, and optimize results through code reflection. Use when implementing experiments for a research paper.
This skills helps agents to review and polish research papers written in LaTeX, focusing on writing clarity, grammar, LaTeX best practices, and document structure.
Search, read, and query research papers via the `alpha` CLI (alphaXiv-backed). Use when the user asks about academic papers, wants to find research on a topic, needs to read a specific paper, ask questions about a paper, inspect a paper's code repository, or manage paper annotations.
Design experiment plans with progressive stages — initial implementation, baseline tuning, creative research, and ablation studies. Plan baselines, datasets, hyperparameter sweeps, and evaluation metrics. Use when planning experiments for a research paper.
Distilled IEEE Transactions writing knowledge from a metadata-filtered local corpus (industrial informatics, control, instrumentation, and related IEEE journals). Trigger when drafting or reviewing IEEE Transactions prose for Abstract, Introduction, Related Work, Method, Experiments, or Conclusion. Not a Nature polish skill and not a LaTeX format checker.
Drafts or revises a publication-ready research paper from RESEARCH.md, producing paper.md and refs.bib. Builds a clear claim-evidence narrative, writes in professional academic style, marks ungrounded claims [UNGROUNDED] and unverified citations [UNVERIFIED] inline, then auto-invokes review. Trigger phrases: "write paper", "draft paper", "revise paper", "start writing".
Critical analysis of research papers, academic manuscripts, preprints, and technical studies — evaluating methodology, claims-evidence alignment, contribution significance, and intellectual honesty. Produces coherent analytical responses (not checklists) that distinguish genuine weaknesses from standard field limitations. Governs intellectual posture: collegial reader, not adversarial reviewer. Triggers on: "critique this paper", "review this research", "what do you think of this paper", "analyze this study", "evaluate the methodology", "is this paper sound", "assess this research", "strengths and weaknesses of this paper", "does the evidence support the claims". Use this skill when the user provides a research paper, preprint, or technical study and asks for critical evaluation of its scientific merit, methodology, or contribution — not formatting, citation hygiene, or submission readiness (use manuscript-review for those).