Loading...
Loading...
Found 96 Skills
将多个研究智能体的发现综合成连贯、结构化的研究报告。解决矛盾、提取共识、创建统一叙述。当多个研究智能体完成研究、需要将发现组合成统一报告、发现之间存在矛盾时使用此技能。
Verify a specific claim by searching for evidence across web and academic sources. Use when the user asks to verify, fact-check, or confirm a statement.
Coordinate a research task by choosing the right workflow and dispatching to specialized agents. Use when the user has a broad or complex research request that may involve multiple steps.
Add items (research objects) to existing research outline.
Conduct preliminary research on a topic and generate research outline. For academic research, benchmark research, technology selection, etc.
Conduct a systematic literature review on an academic topic. Use when the user asks for a literature review, survey, or systematic overview of a research area.
Summarize deep research results into markdown report, cover all fields, skip uncertain values.
Add field definitions to existing research outline.
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 9-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.
Explore and analyze GitHub repositories related to a research topic. Reads deep-research output, discovers repos from multiple sources, deeply analyzes code, and produces integration blueprints.
Synthesizes research findings into design decisions via codebase investigation. Use when (1) translating research into implementation approaches, (2) selecting between design alternatives, (3) executing after /research or deep-research, or (4) preparing input for /plan phase.
Extract falsifiable ideas from input, deep-research each one, and return evidence for or against with strength ratings. Use when user says "find evidence for this", "is this true?", "back this up with data", or "fact-check these claims". Honest about when evidence contradicts the idea.