Loading...
Loading...
Found 81 Skills
Set up or repair codecontext adoption in a project. Use this whenever the user wants to add @context annotations to a repo, install the codecontext toolchain, update AGENTS.md guidance, improve agent workflows around decision capture, or audit whether an existing codecontext setup is coherent. Prefer this skill over vague "document the tool" work: it is specifically for making a repo actually usable with codecontext.
Write multi-chapter books (technical, tutorial, monograph, etc.) end-to-end. Handles outline planning, per-chapter drafting that stays coherent across long manuscripts, chapter review, and final HTML/PDF build. Trigger when user mentions "写书", "写一本书", "出书", "技术书", "book writing", "逐章写作", "O'Reilly", "mdbook", or wants to author a multi-chapter book.
Build a compilable type-level skeleton from a high-level architecture spec before writing any implementation logic. Use when you have an architectural assessment, design doc, or restructuring plan and need to prove the new architecture is sound before migrating code. Also use when asked to "scaffold the new architecture", "create type stubs", "build the shell", "flesh out this spec", "skeleton the modules", or any request to turn architectural intent into verified structure. This skill follows the "Human Builds the Shell" paradigm: types are hard constraints that the compiler enforces, so if the skeleton compiles, the architecture is structurally sound. Especially valuable for large refactors where you don't trust agents to maintain coherence.
Performs ARA Seal Level 2 semantic epistemic review on Agent-Native Research Artifacts, scoring six dimensions (evidence relevance, falsifiability, scope calibration, argument coherence, exploration integrity, methodological rigor) and producing a constructive, severity-ranked report with a Strong Accept-to-Reject recommendation. Use after Level 1 structural validation passes, when an ARA needs an objective epistemic critique before publication or release.
Captures and organizes chaotic brain dumps into a structured, actionable system with zero information loss. Use this skill whenever the user says 'capture this', 'brain dump', 'let me dump some ideas', 'I've got a bunch of thoughts', 'here's everything on my mind', 'idea dump', 'let me get this out of my head', 'I need to organize my thoughts', 'here's what I'm thinking', or any variation where someone is unloading a messy stream of ideas, tasks, thoughts, and plans wanting them turned into something coherent. Also trigger when the user pastes or dictates a long, unstructured block of mixed ideas — even without the exact phrase — the intent is the same. Fast-to-action by design: no upfront intake. Output is four sections (Projects/Ideas, Tasks, Connections, How I Can Help) ending with a directive question. Asks at most one mid-organization clarifying question when a single item is genuinely ambiguous between task and project.
Raise frontend visual judgment for web interfaces with a bias toward refined product-grade composition, precise component craftsmanship, disciplined interaction states, controlled motion, and coherent depth systems. Use when generating, reviewing, or refactoring web UI that feels generic, cluttered, flat, over-styled, theatrically animated, visually imprecise, or AI-generated.
Expert in historical analysis, periodization, material culture, and historiography — validates historical coherence and enriches settings with authentic period detail grounded in primary and secondary sources
Turn the working tree into logical, atomic Conventional Commits — classify uncommitted files as in-scope vs out-of-scope against the branch's merge base, show a staging plan, and create one commit per coherent unit (type + optional scope + British-English body; `!` / `BREAKING CHANGE:` for breaking changes). Never `git add -A`; files that look like they belong to another branch/worktree are never staged silently. Use when asked to commit uncommitted work, tidy WIP into atomic commits, or as the commit step inside a ship flow (e.g. `/send-it`). It commits only — no push, PR, changelog, or Linear writeback.
Build a structured taxonomy of failure modes from open-coded trace annotations. Use this skill whenever the user has freeform annotations from reviewing LLM traces and wants to cluster them into a coherent, non-overlapping set of binary failure categories (axial coding). Also use when the user mentions "failure modes", "error taxonomy", "axial coding", "cluster annotations", "categorize errors", "failure analysis", or wants to go from raw observation notes to structured evaluation criteria. This skill covers the full pipeline: grouping open codes, defining failure modes, re-labeling traces, and quantifying error rates.
Orchestrates end-to-end interview preparation for senior ML/AI engineers targeting Anthropic and peer companies. Use for prep timeline generation, story coherence across rounds, mock scheduling, and debrief analysis. Activate on "interview prep", "interview loop", "Anthropic interview", "prep timeline". NOT for resume writing, career narratives, or individual round-type practice.
Opinionated, evolving constraints to guide agents when building interfaces. Useful for keeping output coherent across many small UI pieces.
Create cinematic movie poster concepts and final poster images from a user's brief, existing video plan, storyboard, character design, or project context. Use this skill whenever the user asks to generate a film poster, movie poster, key art, campaign poster, teaser poster, title poster, or promotional visual for a video project. This skill proposes several creative directions first when appropriate, defaults to a 3:4 poster ratio when no ratio is specified, and ensures typography, title treatment, imagery, genre, setting, and story tone are coherent and visually inventive.