Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,173 Skills
Use when receiving code review feedback, processing PR comments, or needing to evaluate suggestions before implementing - requires technical verification not blind agreement
Automated AI-powered code review that runs on git hooks with progressive disclosure design. Use when setting up automated code review for a project, installing git hooks for code review, creating or modifying review rules, or configuring review behavior. Triggers on requests like "set up AI code review", "install review hooks", "create review rules", or "configure code reviewer".
Code review skill for analyzing code quality, detecting bugs, and ensuring best practices. Provides comprehensive code review with actionable feedback. Use proactively when user requests code review, quality check, or bug detection. Triggers: code review, review code, check code, analyze code, bug detection, 코드 리뷰, 코드 검토, 버그 검사, コードレビュー, バグ検出, 代码审查, 代码检查, revisión de código, revisar código, detección de errores, revue de code, réviser le code, détection de bugs, Code-Review, Code überprüfen, Fehlererkennung, revisione del codice, rivedere codice, rilevamento bug Do NOT use for: design document creation, deployment tasks, or gap analysis (use phase-8-review).
Use when requesting code review, receiving code review feedback, before merging, or when handling reviewer suggestions - covers both giving and receiving review
Unified code review system — dispatches the right review agents for the situation. Use when reviewing code for quality, bugs, compliance, or before merging.
Perform blunt, high-intensity code review in Ukrainian with a colloquial style inspired by Oleksandr Povoroznyuk. Use when users explicitly ask for a harsh/rough tone, slang-heavy feedback, or review comments "in style of Поворознюк", including optional profanity. Keep findings technically precise, actionable, and evidence-based.
Pre-commit code quality review workflow. Use before committing changes to verify code quality, security, testing coverage, and adherence to project conventions. Supports both automated checking and interactive review modes.
Comprehensive code review criteria covering correctness, readability, maintainability, security, performance, and testing. Reference when reviewing code changes or preparing code for review.
Deep line-by-line code review that finds all bugs, logic errors, redundancies, and issues. Traces call stacks, fixes everything, verifies 100%. Use when reviewing features, PRs, code changes, or auditing for bugs.
Go-specific code review with 6-phase methodology: Context, Automated Checks, Quality Analysis, Specific Analysis, Line-by-Line, Documentation. Use when reviewing Go code, PRs, or auditing Go codebases for quality and best practices. Use for "review Go", "Go PR", "check Go code", "Go quality", "review .go". Do NOT use for writing new Go code, debugging Go bugs, or refactoring -- use golang-general-engineer, systematic-debugging, or systematic-refactoring for those tasks.
Structured code review using tiered persona agents, confidence-gated findings, and a merge/dedup pipeline. Use when reviewing code changes before creating a PR.
Use when the user asks to review code, review changes, review a commit, review a PR, audit code quality, check for security issues, or generate a code review report. Trigger on phrases like "review my changes", "코드 리뷰", "check my code", "review the last commit", "what do you think of this diff", "compare branches", "code audit" — even if they don't say "code review" explicitly. For persistent file output use `code-review-md` (markdown) or `code-review-html` (markdown + HTML).