Loading...
Loading...
Found 83 Skills
Draft, audit, or revise point-by-point reviewer response letters for Nature-family manuscript revisions. Use when the user provides reviewer comments, editor decision letters, revision notes, response drafts, or asks how to respond to major/minor revision requests, rebuttal letters, response to reviewers, peer-review reports, 审稿意见回复, 逐点回复, 修回信, 大修回复, 小修回复, or 如何回复 reviewer.
Orchestrate the full paper pipeline end-to-end. Manage state propagation between phases (literature → plan → code → experiments → figures → tables → writing → review), support checkpointing and resumption. Use for assembling a complete paper from components.
Revise papers based on reviewer feedback. Map reviewer concerns to specific sections, apply targeted edits, run additional experiments if needed, and verify improvements. Use after receiving peer review with revision requests.
Generate academic research proposals for PhD applications. Use when user asks to "write a research proposal", "create PhD proposal", "generate research plan", "撰写研究计划", "写博士申请", "doctoral proposal", or mentions specific research topics for PhD application. Supports STEM, humanities, and social sciences with field-specific adaptations. Follows Nature Reviews-style academic writing conventions. Supports both English and Chinese output based on user preference.
Akademiskt skrivande med vetenskaplig stringens — svenska eller engelska. [VAD] Uppsatser, rapporter, avhandlingar, litteraturöversikter, papers enligt högskolestandarder. IMRAD-struktur, Harvard/APA-referenshantering. Tvåspråkig skill. [NÄR] Use when: akademisk, vetenskaplig, uppsats, rapport, avhandling, litteraturöversikt, forskningstext, Harvard-referens, APA-referens, kandidat, master, doktorand, paper, thesis [SPRÅK] Svenska eller engelska — matcha input eller fråga [EXPERTISE] Academic writing, methodology, source criticism, qualitative/quantitative (SV/EN)
Comprehensive academic textbook chapter writing system for medical/scientific content. Use when the user wants to: (1) Write a full textbook chapter (5,000-15,000 words) on any medical/scientific topic, (2) Generate a detailed table of contents with section word counts, (3) Research topics via PubMed MCP and compile 20-30 references, (4) Write section-by-section with proper citations in Vancouver format, (5) Create publishable academic content with Eric Topol-inspired voice and authentic human prose, (6) Get approval at TOC stage before writing begins, (7) Export well-structured chapters for textbook publication.
Bind addressable evidence IDs from `papers/evidence_bank.jsonl` to each subsection (H3), producing `outline/evidence_bindings.jsonl`. **Trigger**: evidence binder, evidence plan, section->evidence mapping, 证据绑定, evidence_id. **Use when**: `papers/evidence_bank.jsonl` exists and you want writer/auditor to use section-scoped evidence items (WebWeaver-style memory bank). **Skip if**: you are not doing evidence-first section-by-section writing. **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: NO PROSE; do not invent evidence; only select from the existing evidence bank.
Generate publication-ready regression tables in LaTeX.
Guides writing effective rebuttals after receiving peer review feedback. Covers review diagnosis (score-driven color-coding), response strategy (champion identification, common-theme consolidation), tactical writing (18 rules), and counterintuitive rebuttal principles. Use when: user received reviewer scores/comments, needs to write a rebuttal or author response, wants to respond to specific criticism (e.g. 'limited novelty', 'missing baselines'), mentions 'rebuttal', 'reviewer comments', 'author response', or 'respond to reviewers'. Do NOT use for pre-submission self-review (use paper-review instead).
Guides pre-writing planning for academic papers with 4 structured steps: story design (task-challenge-insight-contribution-advantage), experiment planning (comparisons + ablations), figure design (pipeline + teaser), and 4-week timeline management. Includes counterintuitive planning tactics (write a mock rejection letter to identify weaknesses before writing, narrow before broad claims, design ablations first). Use when: user wants to plan a paper before writing, design story/contributions, plan experiments, create figure sketches, set a writing timeline, or write a pre-emptive rejection letter for planning purposes. Do NOT use for actual writing (use paper-writing), running experiments (use experiment-pipeline), self-reviewing a finished draft (use paper-review), or finding research problems (use research-ideation).
Draft LaTeX paper section by section from an outline. Use when user says "写论文", "write paper", "draft LaTeX", "开始写", or wants to generate LaTeX content from a paper plan.
Generate publication-quality figures and tables from experiment results. Use when user says "画图", "作图", "generate figures", "paper figures", or needs plots for a paper.