Loading...
Loading...
Found 109 Skills
Guides writing academic papers section by section using an 11-step workflow with LaTeX templates and counterintuitive writing tactics. Covers Abstract, Introduction, Method, Experiments, Related Work, Conclusion, and Supplementary. Use when: user asks to write or draft a paper section, needs LaTeX templates, wants to improve academic writing quality, optimize novelty framing, or mentions 'write introduction', 'draft method', 'paper writing'. Do NOT use for pre-submission review (use paper-review), experiment execution (use experiment-pipeline), or paper planning/story design (use paper-planning).
Draft a structured grant proposal from research ideas and literature. Supports KAKENHI (Japan), NSF (US), NSFC (China, including 面上/青年/优青/杰青/海外优青/重点), ERC (EU), DFG (Germany), SNSF (Switzerland), ARC (Australia), NWO (Netherlands), and generic formats. Use when user says "write grant", "grant proposal", "申請書", "write KAKENHI", "科研費", "基金申请", "写基金", "NSF proposal", or wants to turn research ideas into a funding application.
Write Related Work sections that compare and contrast prior work with your approach. Organize by theme, cite broadly, and explain how your work differs. Use when writing or improving the Related Work section of a paper.
Critical analysis of research papers, academic manuscripts, preprints, and technical studies — evaluating methodology, claims-evidence alignment, contribution significance, and intellectual honesty. Produces coherent analytical responses (not checklists) that distinguish genuine weaknesses from standard field limitations. Governs intellectual posture: collegial reader, not adversarial reviewer. Triggers on: "critique this paper", "review this research", "what do you think of this paper", "analyze this study", "evaluate the methodology", "is this paper sound", "assess this research", "strengths and weaknesses of this paper", "does the evidence support the claims". Use this skill when the user provides a research paper, preprint, or technical study and asks for critical evaluation of its scientific merit, methodology, or contribution — not formatting, citation hygiene, or submission readiness (use manuscript-review for those).
Write publication-ready ML/AI papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use when drafting papers from research repos, structuring arguments, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. Includes LaTeX templates, reviewer guidelines, and citation verification workflows.
Automatically discover research methodology skills when working with research methodology, literature review, systematic review, evidence synthesis, academic research, or experimental design. Activates for research tasks.
Run this repo’s Units+Checkpoints research pipelines end-to-end (survey/综述/review/调研/教程/系统综述/审稿), with workspaces + checkpoints. **Trigger**: run pipeline, kickoff, 继续执行, 自动跑, 写一篇, survey/综述/review/调研/教程/系统综述/审稿. **Use when**: 用户希望端到端跑流程（创建 `workspaces/<name>/`、生成/执行 `UNITS.csv`、遇到 HUMAN checkpoint 停下等待）。 **Skip if**: 用户明确要手工逐条执行（用 `unit-executor`），或你不应自动推进到 prose 阶段。 **Network**: depends on selected pipeline (arXiv/PDF/citation verification may need network; offline import supported where available). **Guardrail**: 必须尊重 checkpoints（无 Approve 不写 prose）；遇到 HUMAN 单元必须停下等待；禁止在 repo root 创建 workspace 工件。
Draft publication-ready Results/Findings sections for quantitative sociology articles. Guides cluster selection, arc construction, paragraph-level moves, and writing techniques based on genre analysis of 83 Social Problems/Social Forces articles across secondary-survey, administrative-data, and content-analysis methods. Use when the user wants to write, draft, or revise a Results section for a quantitative or content-analysis paper. Also use when the user asks for help structuring findings, organizing results, or translating statistical output into publication-ready prose.
Identify your article's contribution type and generate a cross-section vocabulary threading template. Feeds into argument-builder, article-bookends, and abstract-builder for consistent framing across all sections. Based on analysis of 197 articles from AJS, ASR, Social Problems, Social Forces, Social Movement Studies, and Mobilization.
Guides pre-writing planning for academic papers with 4 structured steps: story design (task-challenge-insight-contribution-advantage), experiment planning (comparisons + ablations), figure design (pipeline + teaser), and 4-week timeline management. Includes counterintuitive planning tactics (write a mock rejection letter to identify weaknesses before writing, narrow before broad claims, design ablations first). Use when: user wants to plan a paper before writing, design story/contributions, plan experiments, create figure sketches, set a writing timeline, or write a pre-emptive rejection letter for planning purposes. Do NOT use for actual writing (use paper-writing), running experiments (use experiment-pipeline), self-reviewing a finished draft (use paper-review), or finding research problems (use research-ideation).
Comprehensive guide for writing systems papers targeting OSDI, SOSP, ASPLOS, NSDI, and EuroSys. Provides paragraph-level structural blueprints, writing patterns, venue-specific checklists, reviewer guidelines, LaTeX templates, and conference deadlines. Use this skill for all systems conference paper writing.
Evaluate whether figures and plots in a manuscript effectively communicate the claims they support. Audits chart-type fit, axis design, visual hierarchy, data density, caption interpretation, perceptual accuracy, and narrative arc across 8 dimensions. Triggers on: "do my figures work", "check my plots", "are my graphs clear", "figure audit", "do my figures support my claims", "visualization review", "figure rhetoric", "plot review", "chart critique", "visual argument check". Companion to manuscript-review §12 (legibility) and figure-table-quality (rendering).