Loading...
Loading...
Found 156 Skills
Run a full-scale implementation review with parallel subagents for plan alignment, UI verification, technical and strategic analysis, and test coverage gap closure across app and database layers.
System Architect that creates parallelizable PRDs with junior-proof technical specs. Use when planning features, designing implementations, or when the user says 'plan', 'architect', 'design', or 'PRD'. Outputs PRDs organized in Priority groups where tasks within each group can be executed in parallel by independent dev subagents (ralph). Each user story includes file ownership, technical specs, and acceptance criteria detailed enough for a Sonnet-class model to implement without clarification.
Create subagent definitions for Claude Code and OpenCode that delegate to skills. Use when creating new subagents or refactoring existing ones to follow the delegation pattern.
Progressive context refinement pattern for subagents. Solves the problem of agents not knowing what context they need until they start working. Uses a 4-phase loop: DISPATCH, EVALUATE, REFINE, LOOP.
10-parallel code/design review using reviewer subagents. Use when: - Running code reviews on PRs, commits, or branches - Running design reviews on issues or documents - Need multi-perspective review (security, architecture, code, QA, historian)
Inline adversarial plan review — 3 sequential checks (Feasibility, Completeness, Scope & Alignment) performed by the calling LLM in its own context. No subagents spawned. Call after saving a plan. Returns GATE_PASS or GATE_FAIL with blocking issues.
Dispatches many independent items in parallel: create a table, fan out to subagents, aggregate results. One row = one unit of work.
Fast, zero-friction capture of technical findings from the current conversation to the wiki's _raw/ staging area. Use this skill when the user says "/wiki-quick-chat-capture", "quick capture", "capture this finding", "save this bug fix", "capture this gotcha", "drop this to raw", "quick save to wiki", or wants to capture a non-obvious discovery mid-session without a full wiki-ingest run. Writes one _raw/ file per topic cluster in under 60 seconds — no subagents, no QMD updates, no manifest writes. Run /wiki-ingest or /data-ingest later to promote raw files to proper wiki pages.
Runs a doer -> verifier-panel -> consensus loop to verify a deliverable before it ships. An orchestrator freezes acceptance criteria before implementation, dispatches a doer, then convenes a context-walled panel of independent verifiers - including an adversary with an explicit must-oppose mandate - for evidence-anchored review adjudicated to a SHIP / SHIP_WITH_CAVEATS / ITERATE / BLOCK / ESCALATE verdict logged to a ledger. Use for multi-agent verification of any artifact - code slices, plans, documents, audits - whenever asked to verify a deliverable, vet a plan, run a consensus review or independent review, set up a doer-verifier loop, or gate a ship decision. Works on any platform with parallel subagents; degrades to sequential fresh-context sessions without them. Not for trivial single-file edits or ordinary code review.
Spawn 5 Opus subagents with randomly-generated distinct personas to debate a problem from multiple angles. Use when exploring UX decisions, architecture choices, or any decision that benefits from diverse perspectives arguing creatively.
This skill should be run only when the user explicitly invokes it. Orchestrates end-to-end task implementation — understands the task, assesses complexity, implements directly or via a team of subagents for complex work, and always finishes with a code-polish pass.
Three-phase design review. Chain architect → refiner → critique subagents. Triggers on: 'design review', 'architecture review', '/arc', system design proposals, significant refactoring decisions, new service or module design.