Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,438 Skills
Use for all ClawSweeper work: OpenClaw issue/PR sweep reports, commit-review reports, repair jobs, cloud fix PRs, @clawsweeper maintainer mention commands, trusted ClawSweeper-reviewed autofix/automerge, GitHub Actions monitoring, permissions, gates, and manual backfills.
Use Crabbox for OpenClaw remote Linux validation, warmed reusable boxes, GitHub Actions hydration, sync timing, logs, results, caches, and lease cleanup.
Triage, redact, clean up, and resolve OpenClaw GitHub Secret Scanning alerts in issues or PRs.
Search and download specific files/folders from GitHub repositories directly from terminal using ghgrab, without full clone. Covers install, interactive browsing, release asset download, and automation-safe usage patterns.
Break a large GitHub issue into independent, mergeable sub-issues with clear scope and acceptance criteria. Use when user says 'split this issue', 'break this down', 'this issue is too big', 'splice this epic', 'create sub-issues', or 'decompose this task'. Do NOT use for planning implementation steps within a single issue (use plan-issue) or for creating a fresh issue from scratch.
Replicate and validate a GitHub issue by spinning up Archon, analyzing the issue, and systematically testing all described symptoms using browser automation. Use when: User wants to reproduce a bug, validate a GitHub issue, confirm a reported problem, or investigate whether an issue is real before working on a fix. Triggers: "replicate issue", "reproduce issue", "validate issue", "confirm bug", "test issue", "can you reproduce", "try to replicate", "verify the bug". Capability: Checks out main, pulls latest, starts Archon, reads the GitHub issue, then uses agent-browser to systematically test every symptom and produce a findings report. NOT for: Fixing issues (use /archon or /exp-piv-loop:fix-issue), general UI testing (use /validate-ui).
Create GitHub Pull Request from specification using pull_request_template.md. Use when: spec needs to be converted to PR, spec is ready for review/merge, need to automate PR creation from specification file with template-based body and title.
Read a GitHub Issue, create a detailed plan in `_/local-plans/<issue-number>-<slug>.md`, and implement the code **after user approval**. After implementation, perform a security review (OWASP Top 10) → run tests → commit using Conventional Commits. Used for implementation requests where an Issue number or URL is provided, such as "Implement Issue #N" or "Start working on this Issue".
Generate a single-file interactive HTML code-review artifact for a GitHub PR. Fetches the diff via the gh CLI, performs an honest severity-coded self-review, and renders an artifact with: collapsible per-file diffs with colored inline annotations, severity filter chips, per-finding checkboxes, and a "Create feedback prompt" modal that aggregates the checked items into a paste-ready follow-up prompt ending with "Please address this feedback. Address each individual item in its own conventional commit." Use this skill whenever the user wants to review a pull request visually, asks for an HTML or static review artifact, says "review PR", "review this PR", "build a PR review", wants color-coded findings, feedback aggregation, or a review file they can share — even if they don't explicitly say "HTML". Also trigger on "code review artifact", "interactive review", "feedback prompt for a PR", or when the user mentions reviewing a specific PR number.
Build and maintain the Hermes Atlas ecosystem map with quality filtering, RAG chatbot, and live GitHub star tracking
Emulate supported AI code-review GitHub Actions locally and print a terminal-only review from portable skill instructions. Use when running /review-action or checking local PR-review feedback before publishing.
Performs a comprehensive security review of code changes in a GitHub PR or issue. Checks out the branch, analyzes changed files against a 9-category security checklist, and produces PASS/WARNING/FAIL verdicts. Use when reviewing pull requests for security vulnerabilities, hardcoded secrets, injection flaws, auth bypasses, or insecure configurations. Trigger keywords - security review, code review, appsec, vulnerability assessment, security audit, review PR security.